Suffrage, Debate, And Diplomacy: The Interplay Of Women's Rights

The fight for women's suffrage was a long and arduous one, with supporters campaigning for over fifty years to make their voices heard. The movement was characterised by marches, lectures, lobbying, civil disobedience, and other more confrontational tactics such as picketing and hunger strikes. The debate surrounding women's suffrage was twofold: the public debated the social roles women should play, while in Congress, the discussion centred on who had the authority to make that decision. Women's suffrage was considered a radical notion by many, who believed that men should occupy the public sphere and women, the private. This essay will explore the relationship between women's suffrage and debate and diplomacy, examining the arguments for and against, the key figures involved, and the impact of women's suffrage on politics, both domestically and internationally.

Explore related products

The Concise History of Woman Suffrage: Selections from History of Woman Suffrage, by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Matilda Joslyn Gage, and the National American Woman Suffrage Association

$28

Woman Suffrage and Politics: The Inner Story of the Suffrage Movement

$12.29 $24.95

American Women's Suffrage: Voices from the Long Struggle for the Vote 1776-1965 (LOA #332) (The Library of America)

$40

History Of Woman Suffrage Vol 1

$27.99 $50.99

THE HISTORY OF WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE - Complete 6 Volumes (Illustrated): Chronicles of Feminism's Pioneers and Their Fight for Equality

$1.99

The Woman's Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote

$10.84 $20

The public debate on women's suffrage was about the social roles women should play

For over fifty years, suffragists and anti-suffragists had campaigned publicly to make their voices heard. The suffragists, who were mostly white, educated, and financially stable, argued that women should have the right to vote to empower them. They believed that without the vote, women could never be equal members of society and would be unable to protect their homes and families. Jane Addams, for instance, argued that without the vote, working women lacked economic power and had no say over the conditions they lived and worked in.

On the other hand, anti-suffragists, who also mostly shared the same demographic traits as the suffragists, agreed that women belonged in the home but believed that giving them the vote would hinder them. They saw the behaviour of suffragists as rude and unfeminine and believed that suffrage went against God's will.

The debate over women's suffrage was not just a domestic issue but also an international one. The struggle for women's suffrage was particularly intense in Great Britain and the United States, but these countries were not the first to grant women the right to vote. New Zealand was the first country to grant women's suffrage in 1893, followed by Australia in 1907. After World War I, several countries, including France, Italy, Romania, Yugoslavia, and China, granted women the right to vote.

The debate over women's suffrage was not just about the right to vote but also about the broader social and political roles that women should play. The suffragists wanted women to have a more active role in social and political issues, while the anti-suffragists wanted to maintain the status quo of women being confined to the home. The ultimate goal of women's suffrage was achieved when the 19th Amendment was passed in 1919 and ratified on August 18, 1920, granting women the right to vote in the United States.

Women's suffrage was seen as a way to gain economic power

During the 1850s, the women's rights movement gained momentum, but it lost steam when the Civil War began. After the war, the 14th and 15th Amendments to the US Constitution raised questions of suffrage and citizenship. While the 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870, guaranteed Black men the right to vote, it excluded women. This prompted the formation of the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, who advocated for universal suffrage. They believed that without the vote, women were unable to protect their interests and ensure their economic and social rights.

The NWSA and similar organizations lobbied, protested, and practiced civil disobedience to achieve what was considered a radical change in the Constitution. They argued that women's suffrage was necessary for economic equality and to challenge traditional gender roles that confined women to the home. By 1896, women had gained the right to vote in four states: Wyoming, Colorado, Idaho, and Utah. The growing number of women in the workforce and the formation of women's organizations advocating for economic and political equality further highlighted the need for women's suffrage as a path to economic empowerment.

The debate around women's suffrage was not just about voting rights but also about the social and economic status of women in society. Women's suffrage was seen as a way to challenge traditional gender norms and gain a voice in shaping the economic and political landscape of the country.

Women's suffrage was opposed by many, including religious leaders, who believed it was against God's will

Women's suffrage was a highly contested issue, with many opposing it on various grounds, including religious beliefs. The idea that women's suffrage was against God's will was a common argument used by religious leaders and anti-suffragists during the movement.

The Bible was often cited as a source of authority to justify this stance. Interpretations of Biblical scripture were used to support the view that women should be subordinate to men and confined to the private, domestic sphere. For example, in 1888, Protestant clergyman Horace Bushnell wrote a book arguing that granting women the right to vote would disrupt the household dynamic and, by extension, cause chaos in the public sphere. He appealed to religious sentiments to sway opinions against women's suffrage.

However, not all religious figures and texts supported this view. Reverend Phebe Hanaford, a Quaker minister, was an abolitionist and a supporter of women's suffrage. She was one of twenty-six women who contributed to "The Woman's Bible," offering a reinterpretation of religious texts to advocate for women's equality and enfranchisement.

The debate over women's suffrage extended beyond religious interpretations, with some arguing that women's suffrage would empower them to influence social and political issues more actively. Jane Addams, for instance, argued that without the vote, women could not directly impact the policies in their community and were unable to protect their homes and families.

Others, like Charlotte Perkins Gilman, focused on economic independence for women, seeing the ballot as secondary to other issues such as sensible dress, physical fitness, and professionalized housework.

Despite the opposition, the women's suffrage movement ultimately achieved its goal with the passing of the 19th Amendment in 1919, which was ratified on August 18, 1920, marking a significant victory for women's rights in America.

Explore related products

Suffrage: Women's Long Battle for the Vote

$10.96 $18

The Women's Suffrage Movement

$16.74 $18

The Woman Suffrage Cook Book (Cooking in America)

$12.06 $14.95

Massachusetts in the Woman Suffrage Movement: Revolutionary Reformers (American Heritage)

$21.99

Public Faces, Secret Lives

$17.25 $20

Suffrage Song: The Haunted History of Gender, Race and Voting Rights in the U.S.

$30.62 $34.99

Women's suffrage supporters used a variety of tactics, including picketing, silent vigils, and civil disobedience

Women's suffrage supporters employed a variety of tactics to achieve their goal of gaining the right to vote, including picketing, silent vigils, and civil disobedience. Beginning in the mid-19th century, several generations of women lectured, wrote, marched, lobbied, and practiced civil disobedience to achieve what many Americans considered a radical change in the Constitution.

Picketing was a common tactic used by the National Woman's Party (NWP) to pressure politicians and raise public awareness. In October 1916, NWP members picketed outside the International Amphitheater in Chicago, where President Woodrow Wilson was delivering a speech. They also organised the first White House picket in US history on January 10, 1917, standing vigil in silence six days a week for nearly three years. The "Silent Sentinels" let their banners speak for them, comparing President Wilson to Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany. Many of these sentinels were arrested and jailed, and some even went on hunger strikes to protest their treatment. The NWP's aggressive agitation, relentless lobbying, and creative examples of civil disobedience successfully commanded the attention of politicians and the public, pressuring them to support women's suffrage.

Silent vigils were also employed by suffragists as a form of nonviolent confrontation. In addition to the Silent Sentinels at the White House, suffragists staged large and dramatic parades to draw attention to their cause. In 1913, more than 5,000 suffragists from across the country paraded down Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, DC. These silent protests were a powerful way to make their voices heard without resorting to violence or breaking the law.

Civil disobedience was another important tactic used by women's suffrage supporters. They were willing to break the law and face arrest to bring attention to their cause. For example, Alice Paul broke with the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) to form the more militant NWP, which employed more aggressive tactics. The NWP's members were willing to be arrested and even went on hunger strikes while in jail to protest their treatment and demand recognition as political prisoners. These acts of civil disobedience shocked the nation and brought attention and support to the women's suffrage movement.

Through these varied tactics, women's suffrage supporters were able to effectively pressure politicians and raise public awareness about their cause. Their relentless lobbying, creative publicity stunts, and willingness to engage in nonviolent confrontation ultimately led to the passage and ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920, guaranteeing women the right to vote. This was a significant victory for women's rights and a testament to the power of strategic activism and civil disobedience in driving social and political change.

Women's suffrage altered the political landscape, reducing the likelihood of interstate conflict

Women's suffrage, or the right of women to vote, has been a topic of debate and activism since the mid-19th century. Several generations of women's suffrage supporters have lectured, written, marched, lobbied, and practiced civil disobedience to achieve what many considered a radical change in the Constitution. Finally, in 1919, Congress passed the 19th Amendment, which was ratified on August 18, 1920, granting women the right to vote.

Women's suffrage altered the political landscape in the United States and, as it spread across the democratic world in the first half of the 20th century, it also transformed international politics. One of the notable impacts of women's suffrage was the reduction in the likelihood of interstate conflict, especially between democratic countries.

Research supports the claim that democracies with women's suffrage are less likely to initiate militarized disputes compared to democracies without women's suffrage or autocratic countries. Specifically, democracies without women's suffrage were 192% more likely to initiate conflicts than democracies with women's suffrage, while autocracies were 163% more likely. This finding holds true even when considering the pre-World War II era, suggesting that factors such as economic interdependence, international institutions, and nuclear weapons in the postwar era are not solely responsible for the results.

The impact of women's suffrage on reducing interstate conflict can be attributed to the fact that women are less likely than men to support aggressive international action. As a result, democracies with women's suffrage are expected to initiate fewer conflicts, regardless of whether the potential adversary is a democracy or not. This "democratic peace" phenomenon is still a matter of debate and further investigation.

The achievement of women's suffrage was a significant milestone in the struggle for gender equality and had a profound impact on the political landscape, both domestically and internationally. By gaining the right to vote, women were able to directly influence politics and policies in their communities, challenging traditional gender norms and empowering themselves to shape the future of their countries and the world.

Frequently asked questions