Constitution's Guide To Transformative Constitutional Project

The concept of transformative constitutionalism has been described as a political but nonviolent vehicle, grounded in law, intended to achieve radical social change through the enactment, interpretation, and enforcement of the constitution. It is a long-term project aimed at transforming a country's political and social institutions and power relationships in a democratic, participatory, and egalitarian direction. The idea of transformative constitutionalism gained prominence following South Africa's transition from apartheid to a constitutional democracy, with scholars such as Karl Klare and Justice Pius Langa contributing to the development of this concept. This concept has also been applied in other contexts, such as India, where the Supreme Court has invoked transformative constitutionalism in rulings that advance social progress, including the recognition of third-gender rights and the decriminalization of homosexuality.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$237.78 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.32 $126.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Transformative constitutionalism as a vehicle for social change

Transformative constitutionalism is a political but nonviolent vehicle for social change. It is a process of constitutional enactment, interpretation, and enforcement that aims to transform a country's political and social institutions and power relationships in a democratic, participatory, and egalitarian direction. This process is grounded in law and guided by the values of liberty, equality, and fraternity.

The concept of transformative constitutionalism emerged from the study of the South African Constitution and the freedom movement. The end of apartheid in South Africa and its transition to a constitutional democracy prompted legal scholars to take note of the idea of transformative constitutionalism. US scholar Professor Karl Klare's work, published in 1998, in the South African Journal of Human Rights, was pivotal in shaping this concept. Klare described transformative constitutionalism as a "long-term project" that sought to bring about change by shaping the political and social institutions through the enactment, interpretation, and enforcement of the Constitution.

In South Africa, the desire to address historical wrongs from the apartheid era played a significant role in embracing transformative constitutionalism. The South African Constitutional Court's decision in S v Makwanyane & Another is a notable example of this. The court invalidated the death penalty, not only as a step towards dismantling the apartheid agenda but also in recognition of human dignity and human rights for all.

Transformative constitutionalism has also been observed in contemporary Indian society. The Indian Supreme Court has invoked this concept in several landmark rulings, such as the NALSA judgment, which recognised the rights of the third gender, and the Navtej Singh Johar case, which decriminalised homosexuality. These interpretations of the Constitution have contributed to a more equitable society. Similarly, in India's post-independence era, the transformation extended beyond governance to the entities that held the power to run the country.

Transformative constitutionalism, as a vehicle for social change, can unsettle long-established rules, systems, and practices. For example, in tax law, there may be tension between upholding the transformative constitution and maintaining the integrity of established tax policies. However, transformative constitutionalism offers a structured method for bringing about change while adhering to the basic structure of values defined by a system of government.

Transformative constitutionalism in the Indian context

Transformative constitutionalism is a concept that has been around since 1998, when it was first described by American Professor Karl Klare in his work "Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism". Klare viewed it as a long-term project of constitutional enactment, interpretation, and enforcement, committed to transforming a country's political and social institutions and power relationships in a democratic, participatory, and egalitarian direction.

In the Indian context, transformative constitutionalism has been interpreted in two major ways. Firstly, it is seen as a systematic adoption of a new framework for the Government of India after the country gained independence from British colonial rule in 1947. This transformation was not just in the form of governance but also in the entities that held the power to run the country. Secondly, it is viewed as a process of interpreting and applying the Indian Constitution in a manner that brings about significant social change.

The Indian Supreme Court has played a crucial role in transformative constitutionalism by interpreting the Constitution in a way that ensures a more equitable society. Notable examples include the NALSA judgment, which recognised the rights of the third gender, and the Navtej Singh Johar case, which led to the decriminalisation of homosexuality. The Supreme Court has also protected fundamental rights and constitutional validity by striking down unconstitutional provisions.

Transformative constitutionalism in India goes beyond political and social institutions and includes the struggle for equality within the country for women, adivasis, and Dalits. The values of liberty and dignity, as mentioned in the Preamble of the Constitution, have become central to articulating the rights of marginalised communities. Judicial activism plays a significant role in this process, with judges interpreting the Constitution radically to achieve justice, democracy, and egalitarianism.

Transformative constitutionalism and the role of the Supreme Court

Transformative constitutionalism is a concept that has been described as a political but nonviolent vehicle, grounded in law, intended to achieve radical social change through the enactment, interpretation, and enforcement of the constitution. It is a process that seeks to transform a country's political and social institutions and power relationships in a democratic, participatory, and egalitarian direction. This idea has been particularly influential in South Africa and India, where it has been used to address historical injustices and promote social change.

In South Africa, transformative constitutionalism emerged in the context of the country's transition from apartheid to a constitutional democracy. Scholars like Karl Klare and Justice Pius Langa have noted that the goal of transformative constitutionalism is to "heal the wounds of the past and guide us to a better future" by changing political and social institutions. This has been reflected in significant rulings by the South African Constitutional Court, such as the invalidation of the death penalty, which was seen as an instrument that advanced the apartheid agenda.

In India, transformative constitutionalism has been applied by the Supreme Court to bring about social change and ensure a more equitable society. For example, the Supreme Court's NALSA judgment recognised the rights of the third gender, and the Navtej Singh Johar case ended the criminalisation of homosexuality. The Supreme Court's role as the interpreter of the Constitution has been crucial in bringing about these changes, combined with the growing recognition of the Indian Constitution as a transformative document.

The concept of transformative constitutionalism in India can be traced back to the country's independence from British colonial rule in 1947. This transformation involved a shift in the governance framework and the entities that held the power to run the country. The Indian Constitution, despite its elements of continuity with colonial administration, is seen as a fundamentally "transformative" document that grounds Indian democracy in the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity.

The role of the Supreme Court in transformative constitutionalism is crucial as it acts as the custodian and interpreter of the Constitution. The court's rulings can reinterpret the Constitution to bring about social change and address historical injustices. However, it is important to note that transformative constitutionalism is not without its challenges. In some cases, there may be tension between upholding the transformative constitution and maintaining the integrity of established rules and systems, such as in the area of tax law.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism

$59.81 $76.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$76.95 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $345

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Transformative constitutionalism and historical consciousness

Transformative constitutionalism is a process that aims to bring about radical social change through the enactment, interpretation, and enforcement of a constitution. It is a political but nonviolent vehicle, grounded in law, intended to transform a country's political and social institutions and power relationships in a democratic, participatory, and egalitarian direction. This process is expected to unsettle long-established rules, systems, and practices.

The concept of transformative constitutionalism emerged from the study of the South African Constitution and the freedom movement. It was first described by US scholar Professor Karl Klare in his 1998 work "Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism". Klare viewed transformative constitutionalism as a long-term project committed to shaping political and social institutions through the enactment, interpretation, and enforcement of the Constitution. He characterised it as a futuristic theory aimed at developing and improving existing democracy over the long term.

The South African experience, particularly the desire to remedy apartheid-era historical wrongs, played a significant role in the development of the concept. Former Chief Justice of South Africa, Justice Pius Langa, articulated this idea, stating that the core of transformative constitutionalism is "to heal the wounds of the past and guide us to a better future". This notion of historical consciousness is integral to transformative constitutionalism, as it recognises past injustices and seeks to address them while avoiding their repetition.

In the Indian context, transformative constitutionalism has been interpreted as a systematic adoption of a new framework for the Government of India following independence from British colonial rule in 1947. The Indian Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in interpreting the Constitution to bring about significant changes in substantive law. Notable examples include the recognition of the rights of the third gender, the decriminalisation of homosexuality, and the advancement of equality for women, Dalits, and the Adivasi community.

Transformative constitutionalism, therefore, serves as a guide for nations to transform their societies for the better. It is a process that acknowledges historical consciousness, seeks to address past injustices, and strives for a more equitable and democratic future.

Transformative constitutionalism and the interpretation of the constitution

Transformative constitutionalism is a concept that has been described as a political but nonviolent vehicle, grounded in law, intended to achieve radical social change through the enactment, interpretation, and enforcement of the constitution. It is a process aimed at social and political emancipation through legally mandated means, calling for an 'activist' approach in the adjudication of rights. This idea has been applied in various countries, including India, South Africa, and Kenya, with the goal of transforming societies for the better and achieving greater democracy, participation, and egalitarianism.

In India, transformative constitutionalism has been evident in Supreme Court rulings that have reinterpreted the Constitution to create a more equitable society. For example, the NALSA judgment recognised the rights of the third gender, and the Navtej Singh Johar case ended the criminalisation of homosexuality. These interpretations reflect an overarching commitment to political and social transformation, as argued by Gautam Bhatia in "The Transformative Constitution".

South Africa's experience with transformative constitutionalism is also notable, influenced by the desire to remedy apartheid-era historical wrongs. The country's transition to a constitutional democracy involved interpreting the Constitution with an awareness of its history, leading to the invalidation of the death penalty and advancements in human rights. German jurisprudence, with its aim to correct historical wrongs from the Nazi era, reflects similar principles.

Kenya's approach to transformative constitutionalism has intersected with tax law and policy, raising questions about the need for radical change and the balance between upholding the transformative constitution and established rules and systems. This process often unsettles long-standing norms and practices, requiring a careful navigation of social and political institutions.

Transformative constitutionalism is not a new concept, first described by US scholar Professor Karl Klare in 1998 in the context of South Africa. Klare defined it as a long-term project committed to transforming a country's political and social institutions and power relationships in a democratic, participatory, and egalitarian direction. This interpretation has been influential in shaping discussions around constitutional transformation.

Frequently asked questions