Constitutional Comparisons: Us Vs. The World

The United States Constitution has had a significant influence on the constitutions of other nations, both in terms of its content and the process by which it was created. The US Constitution was one of the first written constitutions, and its fundamental idea was that the people of a nation hold the power to formulate and promulgate it. This concept, known as constitutional convention, has been universally influential and has given permanence to subsequent constitutions. The US Constitution has influenced nations across the world, including Liberia, China, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh, and Peru. Its impact can be seen in similarities of phrasing, borrowed passages, and principles such as the rule of law, separation of powers, and recognition of individual rights. However, the influence of the US Constitution has been waning since the 1980s as countries create new constitutions or update older ones, and some critics argue that it guarantees relatively few rights compared to other nations' constitutions. The proposed constitution for the European Union, for example, differs significantly from the US Constitution in its lengthy preamble and emphasis on the free movement of people and services.

Explore related products

Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law: Essays for Mark Tushnet (Oxford Comparative Constitutionalism)

$165 $164.99

Comparative Constitutional Law, 3d (University Casebook Series)

$305

Comparative Constitutional Law and Politics: Analysis, Cases, & Materials

$49.99 $55

Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law: Second Edition (Elgar Advanced Introductions series)

$31.95

Comparative Constitutional Law (Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series)

$161.04 $357

The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford Handbooks)

$58.09 $95

Influence on other nations' constitutions

The United States Constitution has had a profound influence on the constitutions of other nations, both in terms of its specific provisions and its broader principles. Its impact is evident in similarities of phrasing, borrowed passages, and the adoption of certain concepts and innovations.

One of the key influences of the US Constitution is the idea that the people of a nation are the source of sovereign power and are capable of formulating and promulgating a constitution. This notion gave rise to the concept of a constitutional convention, which became a universal feature of subsequent constitutions, bestowing upon them the essential characteristic of permanence. The US Constitution's provisions for presidential executives, federalism, and judicial review have also been widely adopted.

The US Constitution's principles of the rule of law, separation of powers, and recognition of individual rights have resonated with constitution-makers worldwide. Its influence can be traced through different historical periods, from its impact on northwestern Europe and its colonial connections after the American Revolution, to its inspiration for nationalist movements in Asia and Latin America following the Spanish-American War. It also influenced decolonization movements in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia after World War I, and continued to be a reference point for independence movements after World War II.

However, the influence of the US Constitution has not been universally embraced. Democratizing countries often favoured more centralized models, such as the British Westminster system or the French model. Additionally, certain cultural contexts, such as Confucian and Islamic cultures, have not readily adopted some of its premises.

In recent times, the influence of the US Constitution has somewhat diminished as countries have created new constitutions or updated older ones. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for example, suggested that a nation seeking a new constitution might find better models in the constitutions of South Africa, Canada, or the European Convention on Human Rights. Nonetheless, the US Constitution remains a significant reference point in the ongoing international dialogue about constitutionalism and governance.

The right to keep and bear arms

> "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The interpretation of this amendment has been the subject of considerable debate, with some arguing that it creates an individual constitutional right to possess firearms, while others point to the prefatory language of "a well-regulated Militia" to argue that the Framers intended only to restrict Congress from legislating away a state's right to self-defence. The US Supreme Court has also weighed in on this issue, ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) that the amendment protects an individual's right "to keep and carry arms in case of confrontation," regardless of service in a militia.

While the right to bear arms is protected in the US Constitution, it is notably absent from other important human rights documents such as the American Convention on Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In fact, of all the constitutions in the world, only two others explicitly protect this right: Mexico and Guatemala. The Mexican Constitution of 1857 first included the right to be armed, though this was amended in 1917 following Mexico's bloody revolution, and the country now has strict controls on civilian gun ownership. Guatemala permits gun ownership with severe restrictions, including a ban on fully automatic weapons and limits on ammunition ownership.

The inclusion of the right to bear arms in a written constitution is uncommon, with only a small minority of countries ever including it. In recent years, some countries have considered adding this right to their constitutions, such as the Czech Republic in 2017 and Switzerland in 1997, but these proposals have not always gained the necessary support.

The sovereignty of the people

The United States Constitution has had a significant influence on the legal thinking and constitutional development of other nations. The US Constitution's emphasis on popular sovereignty, with laws drafted by the people's representatives, has been particularly impactful. This marked a paradigm shift in the locus of "sovereignty," transferring power from monarchs to the body of the people of each state. This principle of rule by popular consent, as opposed to the rule of a sovereign, set a precedent for emerging nations seeking to establish freely elected governments.

The US Constitution's influence can be seen in the similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions, particularly in former European colonies in the 19th and 20th centuries. Countries in Latin America, Asia, and later Africa and the Middle East, referenced the US Constitution during their independence and decolonization movements. They adopted concepts such as constitutional conventions, written constitutions, separation of powers, ratification and amendment procedures, and recognition of individual rights.

Nationalists such as Jose Rizal of the Philippines and Sun Yat-sen of China drew direct inspiration from the US Constitution in their push for reforms and self-governance. Rizal advocated for representation in the Spanish Parliament, citing the American experience of seeking representation in the British Parliament before the American Revolution. Sun Yat-sen, influenced by American democracy, established a provisional Republican government in China in the early 20th century.

However, it is important to note that the influence of the US Constitution has not been universally adopted. Democratizing countries, especially those with Confucian and Islamic cultures, often chose more centralized British or French models of government, such as the British Westminster system. Additionally, the US has been criticized for its complex relationship with American colonialism and imperialism, particularly regarding Native peoples and people of color.

In conclusion, the US Constitution's principles of popular sovereignty and rule by consent have had a significant impact on the constitutional development of other nations, particularly during their transitions to self-governance and the establishment of representative governments. However, its influence has varied across different cultural and historical contexts, and it has faced criticisms for its colonial implications.

Explore related products

The Story of Constitutions (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)

$29.99 $29.99

Constitutionalism in Context (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)

$53 $53

The U.S. Constitution and Comparative Constitutional Law: Texts, Cases, and Materials (University Casebook Series)

$305

The Entrenchment of Democracy: The Comparative Constitutional Design of Elections, Parties and Voting (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)

$100.73 $130

The Rights of Women in Comparative Constitutional Law

$44.79 $55.99

Comparative Constitutional Design (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)

$43.53 $60

The US as a constitutional republic

The United States Constitution has had a profound influence on the world, with its concepts of governance and innovations in constitutional conventions, written constitutions, ratification, and amendment procedures being adopted by many other nations. The US Constitution was the first document of its kind to be called a "constitution", and its fundamental idea—that the people of a nation hold the power to formulate and promulgate a constitution—has been a wellspring of inspiration for other nations.

The US Constitution has influenced nations across the world, including Liberia, China, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh, Peru, Mexico, the Philippines, and France. Its impact is seen in similarities of phrasing, borrowed passages, and principles such as the rule of law, separation of powers, and recognition of individual rights. The US Constitution's longevity and ongoing evolution through amendments demonstrate its adaptability and relevance over time.

However, the influence of the US Constitution has been waning since the 1980s as other countries have created new constitutions or updated older ones. Some scholars argue that the US Constitution guarantees relatively few rights compared to other nations' constitutions and contains less than half of the provisions listed in the average bill of rights. For example, it is one of the few constitutions that still includes the right to keep and bear arms.

The United States is the oldest and largest surviving constitutional republic, and its Constitution has provided the political and legal framework for the country's success. The preamble of the US Constitution, with its concise and general description of objectives, stands in contrast to the lengthy preamble of the proposed EU Constitution, which has been criticised for its ambiguity and failure to address important issues.

In conclusion, while the US Constitution has had a significant impact on the constitutions of other nations, its influence is not static and has faced competition from other models. The US Constitution remains a living document that continues to shape America's national dialogue and conflict resolution.

The US Constitution's preamble

The preamble to the US Constitution is an introductory statement that sets out the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. It is not a law itself, but it sets the stage for the Constitution, the highest law of the land. The preamble communicates the aspirations that "We the People" have for our government and our way of life as a nation. It outlines five objectives, including the establishment of justice, and was drafted in six weeks during the summer of 1787 in Philadelphia.

The US Constitution, including its preamble, has had a significant influence on the legal thinking and constitutions of other nations. Its impact was particularly notable in the mid-19th century when European colonies referenced it in developing their own freely elected governments, citing the rights of man and the separation of powers. For example, President Benito Juarez of Mexico implemented practices like judicial review when introducing more liberal policies into the Mexican constitution. The US Constitution also influenced nationalist movements in Asia and Latin America following the Spanish-American War (1898-1918), and its impact spread to decolonization movements in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia after World War I.

The US Constitution's principles of governance, such as constitutional conventions, written constitutions, and the recognition of individual rights, have influenced other countries' legal systems and constitutions. Its phrasing and passages have been borrowed by other nations, and it has inspired calls for political reform and representative government. However, some argue that its influence has been waning in recent decades as other countries have created or updated their constitutions, and it guarantees relatively few rights compared to other nations' constitutions.

The preamble's reference to the "United States of America" has been interpreted to explain the nature of the federal government created by the Constitution. It reflects the concept of rule by popular consent, with laws drafted by the people's representatives, rather than by a sovereign ruler. This sets the US Constitution apart from older nations' laws, which were often created by reigning monarchs.

Frequently asked questions