Amending The Constitution: A Step-By-Step Guide

Amending the Constitution is a difficult and time-consuming process. The United States Constitution was written to endure for ages to come, and its framers intentionally made it challenging to amend. Since 1787, it has only been amended 27 times. Article V of the Constitution outlines the procedures for amending it, and there are two methods for proposing amendments: through Congress or by constitutional convention. A proposed amendment must be passed by a two-thirds supermajority in both houses of Congress, and then ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures. The process is similar in other countries, such as Ireland, Estonia, and Australia, where amendments originate as bills and become law through acts of parliament or referendums.

Explore related products

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.21

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$105.51 $150

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

The legislative method: a supermajority of two-thirds must approve the proposal

Amending the US Constitution is a challenging and time-consuming process. The legislative method requires a supermajority of two-thirds to approve a proposal, demonstrating the high threshold for changes to the nation's foundational document. This process is outlined in Article V of the Constitution, which grants the authority to amend this critical document.

The legislative method, also known as the congressional method, is one of the two ways to propose amendments established by Article V. The other method is the constitutional convention method, which has never been used to propose an amendment. To initiate the legislative method, a supermajority of two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate must approve a proposal. This high bar ensures that any amendment has broad support in Congress and is not merely a partisan endeavour.

The legislative process for amending the Constitution reflects the framers' intention for the document to endure. Since the Constitution was drafted in 1787, it has been amended only 27 times, including the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights. The legislative method, with its supermajority requirement, is designed to ensure that any changes to the Constitution are carefully considered and broadly supported.

Once an amendment proposal passes the two-thirds supermajority threshold in Congress, it is sent to the states for ratification. This process is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist has delegated many duties to the Director of the Federal Register, who examines ratification documents for legal sufficiency and authenticity.

To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50). This requirement ensures that any changes to the Constitution reflect the consent of a significant majority of the states. The ratification process can include deadlines, either specified in the amendment itself or in the joint resolution proposing it. If an amendment does not meet the required number of states' ratifications within the set time frame, it is considered inoperative.

The convention method: two-thirds can call a general election to revise the Constitution

Amending the Constitution of the United States is a difficult and time-consuming process. The framers of the Constitution made it challenging to amend the document to ensure its longevity. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted four years later as the Bill of Rights.

Article V of the Constitution outlines the procedures for amending it. Two methods are established by Article V for proposing amendments to the Constitution. The first method is the legislative method, which involves a proposed amendment being approved by a supermajority of two-thirds of each house of Congress.

The second method is the convention method, which allows two-thirds of state legislatures to call for a general election to decide whether to convene a constitutional convention to revise the Constitution. This method has never been used to propose an amendment. However, it has gained supporters, including retired federal judge Malcolm R. Wilkey, who argued that a new convention is necessary to address issues such as gridlock and the excessive influence of interest groups.

Once an amendment is proposed, either by Congress or a constitutional convention, it must be ratified. Ratification requires approval by three-fourths of the state legislatures, or 38 out of 50 states. The Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for administering the ratification process. The amendment process is finalized when the Archivist certifies that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution.

While the process of amending the Constitution is challenging, it ensures that any changes made are carefully considered and have a significant impact on the nation and its citizens.

The initiative method: an amendment is proposed by a petition of voters

Amending the US Constitution is a challenging and time-consuming process. The framers of the Constitution intended it to be a difficult task, as evidenced by the fact that there have only been 27 amendments since it was drafted in 1787. The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution.

One method of proposing an amendment is through the initiative process, which involves a petition of voters. This method is known as the People's Initiative and is one of the three ways to propose amendments, the other two being a Constituent Assembly and a Constitutional Convention. The initiative method allows citizens to directly participate in the amendment process by initiating a ballot measure to amend their state's constitution.

In the initiative method, an amendment proposal is initiated by collecting signatures from registered voters in a state. The number of signatures required varies and is typically based on a percentage of the votes cast in the previous gubernatorial election or the number of representatives in Congress. Once the required number of signatures is collected, the proposed amendment is then submitted to the voters during a general or special election, also known as a referendum.

It's important to note that not all states allow the initiative method for amending their constitutions. Currently, 18 states permit citizens to initiate constitutional amendments through this process, with variations in the specific requirements and procedures. For example, in some states, the initiative process is direct, going directly to the voters, while in others, it is indirect, going through the state legislature before reaching the voters.

The initiative method empowers citizens to take an active role in shaping their state's constitution and ensures that the amendment process is not solely controlled by legislators. However, it is just the first step in the amendment process, as the proposed amendment still needs to go through the ratification process, which involves approval by a certain majority of voters and state legislatures, as outlined in the previous section.

Explore related products

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

The United States Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Large Print Edition (Annotated)

$9.99

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.59 $180

The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought

$95

The Archivist's role: the Archivist of the US certifies the amendment

The Archivist of the United States is the head and chief administrator of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist is responsible for the supervision and direction of the National Archives. The Archivist has the responsibility for administering the ratification process after Congress proposes an amendment.

The Archivist submits the proposed amendment to the States for their consideration by sending a letter of notification to each Governor along with the informational material prepared by the OFR. The Governors then formally submit the amendment to their State legislatures or call for a convention, depending on what Congress has specified. When a State ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends the Archivist an original or certified copy of the State action, which is immediately conveyed to the Director of the Federal Register.

The OFR examines ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. If the documents are found to be in good order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them. The OFR retains these documents until an amendment is adopted or fails, and then transfers the records to the National Archives for preservation.

A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States). When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to the Congress and to the Nation that the amendment process has been completed.

In recent history, the signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function attended by various dignitaries, which may include the President. The Archivist does not make any substantive determinations as to the validity of State ratification actions, but it has been established that the Archivist's certification of the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents is final and conclusive.

Article V: the authority to amend the Constitution is derived from this article

Article V of the United States Constitution outlines the procedure for altering the Constitution and authorises Congress to propose amendments. It provides two methods for amending the nation's frame of government.

The first method authorises Congress, "whenever two-thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary," to propose constitutional amendments. This method has been used for all 33 amendments submitted to the states for ratification. The second method, which has never been used, requires Congress, "on the application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states" (34 as of 1959), to "call a convention for proposing amendments". This duality in Article V is the result of compromises made during the 1787 Constitutional Convention between two groups, one maintaining that the national legislature should have no role in the constitutional amendment process, and another contending that proposals to amend the Constitution should originate in the national legislature and their ratification should be decided by state legislatures or state conventions.

To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by either the legislatures of three-quarters of the states or by ratifying conventions conducted in three-quarters of the states. This process has been utilised only once in American history, with the 1933 ratification of the Twenty-First Amendment. The vote of each state (to either ratify or reject a proposed amendment) carries equal weight, regardless of a state's population or length of time in the Union.

Article V also contains a "shielding clause" which prohibits amendments prior to 1808 that would have affected the Constitution's limitations on Congress's power to restrict the slave trade or levy certain taxes on land or slaves. The limitations on amendments have since expired, but the second sentence of Article V, which remains in effect, prohibits amendments that would deprive states, without their consent, from having equal suffrage in the Senate.

Frequently asked questions