Amending The Constitution: Process Maintenance

The process of amending the US Constitution is a complex and challenging task, as the framers intended when it was first drafted in 1787. Since then, the Constitution has been amended only 27 times, indicating the high bar for any proposed changes. The amendment process begins with a proposal from Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or through a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Once proposed, an amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, a challenging feat that has resulted in a selective amendment process focused on significant issues impacting all Americans or securing citizens' rights. The amendment process is a key mechanism for adapting the Constitution to the evolving needs of the nation, but its difficulty ensures that changes are reserved for matters of great importance.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$104.91 $150

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.21

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

The role of Congress in proposing amendments

The United States Constitution was crafted to endure for ages, and the framers made the process of amending it a challenging task. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since 1787, and each amendment has undergone a rigorous process. The role of Congress in proposing amendments is crucial and well-defined.

Congress plays a central role in initiating the amendment process. According to Article V of the Constitution, an amendment can be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This supermajority requirement ensures that amendments reflect a broad consensus within Congress and that they are not passed lightly. Once an amendment is proposed by Congress, it is done so in the form of a joint resolution. It is important to note that the President does not have a constitutional role in this process, and the joint resolution does not require their signature or approval.

The amendment process through Congress has been the exclusive pathway for proposing amendments so far, as none of the 27 amendments have been proposed by a constitutional convention. This alternative route, which has never been utilised, would require two-thirds of the state legislatures to call for a constitutional convention. However, the idea of a constitutional convention has its supporters, including retired federal judge Malcolm R. Wilkey, who argued that the current system has led to gridlock and excessive influence by interest groups.

After an amendment is proposed by Congress, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), takes on the responsibility for administering the ratification process. The Archivist works in conjunction with the Director of the Federal Register, to whom many ministerial duties are delegated. Together, they follow established procedures and customs previously carried out by the Secretary of State and the Administrator of General Services.

The proposed amendment is then submitted to the states for their consideration. The Archivist sends a letter of notification to each state governor, along with informational material prepared by NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR). The governors then formally submit the amendment to their state legislatures. The amendment becomes part of the Constitution once it is ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states).

In summary, the role of Congress in proposing amendments is to achieve a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers to initiate the process. This step has been the traditional pathway for proposing amendments, and it reflects the careful and deliberate nature of constitutional changes in the United States.

State legislatures' role in the process

The process of amending the Constitution of the United States is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.

State legislatures play a crucial role in the amendment process, as they can initiate the amendment process by calling for a constitutional convention. In the past, some state legislatures have not waited for official notice from Congress before taking action on a proposed amendment. Once an amendment is proposed, either by Congress or a constitutional convention, it must be ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states) to become part of the Constitution. This is done by each state's governor formally submitting the amendment to their state legislature. When a state ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends an original or certified copy of the state action to the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist delegates many of the duties associated with the amendment process to the Director of the Federal Register.

The Director of the Federal Register examines the ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. If the documents are in order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them until the amendment is adopted or fails. The Director then transfers the records to the National Archives for preservation.

It is important to note that, while the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, the signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function that the President may attend. Additionally, while a constitutional convention can be called by two-thirds of state legislatures, none of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed through this method.

The Archivist's role in administering the process

The Archivist of the United States, who leads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for overseeing the amendment process as outlined in Article V of the Constitution. While the Archivist has delegated many of the day-to-day tasks to the Director of the Federal Register, they still play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the process.

One of the key responsibilities of the Archivist is to certify the validity of an amendment. Once the OFR has received and verified the required number of authenticated ratification documents from the states, the Archivist reviews and certifies that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is a formal proclamation published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large, serving as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process is complete. The Archivist's signature on this certification has become a ceremonial event, often attended by dignitaries, including the President.

Additionally, the Archivist is responsible for maintaining the records and documents related to the amendment process. When a state ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends the Archivist an original or certified copy of the state's action. The Archivist then conveys these documents to the Director of the Federal Register for examination and safekeeping until the amendment is adopted or fails. The Archivist ensures that the proper procedures and customs established for the ratification process are followed, maintaining the continuity and integrity of the amendment process.

Furthermore, the Archivist plays a role in interpreting and clarifying the amendment process. While they do not make substantive determinations on the validity of state ratification actions, the Archivist's interpretation of the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents is considered final and conclusive. This aspect of the role ensures that there is clarity and consensus on the requirements and procedures for amending the Constitution.

Overall, the Archivist of the United States has a critical role in administering the amendment process. By certifying the validity of amendments, maintaining records, and providing interpretation, the Archivist ensures that the process is fair, transparent, and consistent with the provisions outlined in Article V of the Constitution. Their role contributes to the preservation and evolution of the Constitution, ensuring that it remains a living document capable of adapting to the needs of a changing nation.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$16 $26.99

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.59 $180

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought

$95

The Federal Register's role in processing and publication

The Federal Register is a centralised filing and publication system that serves as a single, uniform publication for executive agency rules and notices, presidential documents, and the Code of Federal Regulations. It is produced by the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO).

The OFR plays a crucial role in processing and publishing amendments to the Constitution. Once an amendment is proposed by Congress, it is forwarded directly to the OFR for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format. Additionally, the OFR assembles an information package for the states, which includes formal "red-line" copies of the joint resolution and copies in slip law format.

The OFR also examines ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and authenticating signatures. If the documents are in order, the Director of the Federal Register acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them. The OFR retains these documents until an amendment is adopted or fails, at which point the records are transferred to the National Archives for preservation.

When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is then published in the Federal Register, serving as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process has been completed.

The OFR also offers amendatory instructions to help agencies when changes are needed. By using "revise and republish," agencies can provide context for changes while discussing specific amendments in the preamble without needing to use amendatory language. This approach reduces the time and resources required for processing and decreases the opportunity for errors.

The difficulty of amending the Constitution

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come", as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s. The framers of the Constitution intended to make it a challenging process to amend the document, and this has proven true in recent times with supporters of congressional term limits and a balanced budget amendment failing to get the changes they desired. Since it was drafted in 1787, there have only been 27 amendments to the Constitution, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted as the Bill of Rights four years later.

The process of amending the Constitution is a lengthy and arduous one. A proposed amendment must first be passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress, and then it must be ratified by three-quarters of the state legislatures. This means that 38 out of 50 states must approve of the amendment for it to pass. This two-step process, requiring approval from both Congress and the states, ensures that any changes made to the Constitution are widely supported and carefully considered.

The President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, further emphasising the importance of maintaining a separation of powers and ensuring that any amendments are not driven by the agenda of a single individual. The amendment process is also notable for its lack of mention of political parties, despite their significant role in US politics.

In addition, the Constitution provides an alternative method for proposing amendments, which involves two-thirds of state legislatures requesting that Congress call a Constitutional Convention. However, this method has never been used, and the process of amending the Constitution has always begun with Congress.

Frequently asked questions