Federalists And Antifederalists: The Great Compromise For Constitution Ratification

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states. They opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. The Federalists were better organised and ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates.

Explore related products

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Great Compromise which Created the Government of the United States of America: Volume Two: The Populist - Anti-Federalist Papers

$32.12

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection

$1.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$10 $15.59

The Federalists' and Anti-Federalists' positions on the Constitution

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing positions on the Constitution. The Federalists were in favour of the adoption of the Constitution, while the Anti-Federalists were against it. The Federalists were better organised and had strong support in the press, which ultimately helped them prevail in state ratification debates. They were also advocating positive changes by proposing an alternative to the Articles of Confederation, which were generally considered to be inadequate.

The Anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. James Madison reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach. The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens.

Although the Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution, this harmony did not filter into the presidency of George Washington.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the Constitution

Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. Arguments between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts even erupted in a physical brawl between Elbridge Gerry and Francis Dana. Sensing that Anti-Federalist sentiment would sink ratification efforts, James Madison reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach.

The Anti-Federalists wrote many essays to express their opposition to the Constitution, but the Federalists were better organised and ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates. The Federalists were also better supported in the press of the day.

The Federalists' support for the Constitution

The Federalists were supporters of the Constitution and were in favour of its adoption. They were better organised than the Anti-Federalists and had strong support in the press. They were successful in articulating their position through papers and other writings, and ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates.

The Federalists proposed an alternative to the Articles of Confederation, which were generally considered to be inadequate. They saw the new national government as a positive change, which would not threaten individual liberties.

The Federalists' position was also bolstered by the fact that they had strong support in the press of the day. They were able to use this platform to successfully advocate for the adoption of the Constitution.

Explore related products

The Federalist Papers (Signet Classics)

$8.12 $8.95

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Mapping the Constitution: The Cartographic History of the Ratification of the Constitution

$25.07 $40

Original Intentions: On the Making and Ratification of the United States Constitution

$32.88

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

The role of the press in the Federalist/Anti-Federalist debates

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. James Madison reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach.

The Federalists were better organized and had strong support in the press of the day. They successfully articulated their position in favour of the adoption of the Constitution through papers and other writings. The Federalist/Anti-Federalist debates further illustrate the vigour of the rights to freedom of speech and press in the United States, even before the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was adopted.

The Bill of Rights

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution. However, this harmony did not extend to the presidency of George Washington. The Anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. James Madison reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach. The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. They were fashioned after the English Bill of Rights and George Mason’s Virginia Declaration of Rights.

The Federalists were better organized and ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates. The Federalist/Anti-Federalist debates further illustrate the vigor of the rights to freedom of speech and press in the United States, even before the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Frequently asked questions