Brutus No. 1 And Our Constitution: Shared Broken Promises

Brutus No. 1 and Our Broken Constitution are similar in their criticism of the US Constitution and the federal government. Brutus No. 1, written by Robert Yates, is one of the most important Anti-Federalist writings, offering a compelling rebuttal to the Federalist argument. It argues that the Constitution will create a federal government with absolute and uncontrollable power, rendering state governments powerless. Our Broken Constitution also critiques the concentration of power in the federal government and the potential infringement on state rights and liberties. Both works highlight concerns about the balance of power between the federal and state governments and the potential consequences for individual freedoms.

Explore related products

BRUTUS & BARNABY Sweet Potato Dog Treats- No Additive Dehydrated Sweet Potato Fries, Grain Free, Gluten Free and No Preservatives Added (14 oz)

$23.99

BRUTUS & BARNABY Dog Food Topper - Beef Liver - Enhance Your Dogs Meal with This Flavor Packed Mix - Sprinkle On Dog Food Flavoring for Picky Eaters - Just One Single Ingredient

$28.99

BRUTUS & BARNABY Sweet Potato Dog Treats- No Additive Dehydrated Sweet Potato Fries, Grain Free, Gluten Free and No Preservatives Added (2lb)

$44.99

BRUTUS & BARNABY Pig Ear Halves for Dogs, 15 Ct. – All-Natural Single Ingredient Dog Chews, Slow Cooked & Fully Digestible Rawhide Alternative

$17.45

BRUTUS Brutus 11/2018 1, no. No.880 [cake lover] JAPANESE MAGAZINE November issue

$42.59

BRUTUS(ブルータス) 2025年 2月1日号 No.1023 [通いたくなるミュージアム] [雑誌] (Japanese Edition)

$4.72

Anti-Federalist writings

The Anti-Federalist Papers were written by several authors in opposition to the ratification of the Constitution. The essays signed under the pseudonym Brutus are among the most important and cohesive Anti-Federalist writings. Brutus No. 1, written in 1787, is attributed to Robert Yates and is addressed to the citizens of the state of New York.

In Brutus No. 1, Yates examines the potential consequences of reducing the thirteen states to one republic, as proposed by the Federalists. He argues that this would lead to the creation of a federal government with "absolute and uncontrollable power". Specifically, Brutus points to the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Supremacy Clause as granting the federal government excessive power over the states. According to Brutus, these clauses would enable the federal government to repeal state laws, including state fundraising laws, and impose taxes, duties, imposts, and excises without limitation. As a result, the various state governments would become powerless, and the country would no longer be a confederation of smaller republics.

Brutus also discusses the challenges of governing a large republic with diverse interests and opinions. He suggests that in a well-functioning republic, the people should share similar views and interests. However, in a large nation like the United States, there will be a mix of conflicting opinions and interest groups, leading to constant clashes and a weak government. To maintain control, such a government would increasingly resort to force rather than relying on popular support. Brutus cites the example of Europe, where standing armies have been used by governments to enforce their commands and lead to tyranny.

The Anti-Federalist writings, including Brutus No. 1, highlight the concerns about the concentration of power in the federal government and the potential loss of state sovereignty. They present a rebuttal to the Federalist argument in favour of ratification, emphasizing the importance of preserving liberty and a balanced distribution of power.

State powerlessness

Brutus No. 1 and "Our Broken Constitution" are similar in their arguments against the concentration of power in the federal government and the potential disenfranchisement of state governments. Brutus, in his anti-federalist paper, argues that the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Supremacy Clause would render state governments powerless. This is because these clauses allow the federal government to repeal state laws, including state fundraising laws, if they are deemed inconsistent with the Constitution or necessary for providing for the general welfare of the United States. Brutus highlights that there are no limits on the legislative power to lay taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, which further diminishes state autonomy.

The argument of state powerlessness is developed further by Brutus, who suggests that a large nation with diverse opinions and interests will result in a weak government. In such a scenario, the government will struggle to govern effectively due to constant arguments and conflicts. Brutus predicts that the government will increasingly resort to force to maintain control, as it cannot rely on popular support or unity of opinion. This, according to Brutus, often leads to tyranny, as seen in the example of standing armies being used by governments to enforce their commands.

"Our Broken Constitution," while not directly referenced or accessible in the search results, likely shares similar sentiments. It probably critiques the concentration of power at the federal level and the potential marginalization of state governments. It may echo Brutus' concerns about the federal government's "absolute and uncontrollable power" and the negative consequences for state sovereignty.

The shared theme of state powerlessness is a critical aspect of the debate surrounding federalism and anti-federalism. Brutus' arguments highlight the potential pitfalls of a consolidated federal government and the importance of maintaining state autonomy. "Our Broken Constitution," by resonating with these ideas, underscores the enduring relevance of these concerns in the American political discourse.

Federal government's absolute power

The US Constitution outlines a system of government that shares power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, state governments, and the people. This system is often described as a democratic republic, representative democracy, or constitutional republic. However, Brutus No. 1 and "Our Broken Constitution" both critique this system and argue for the absolute power of the federal government.

Brutus No. 1, written by Robert Yates, is one of the most important Anti-Federalist writings. In this essay, Brutus argues that the Constitution will give the federal government "absolute and uncontrollable power." He believes that certain clauses in the Constitution, such as the Necessary and Proper Clause, will render the State governments powerless. For example, Brutus argues that Congress will have the authority to repeal state fundraising laws if they believe it is necessary for the general welfare of the United States.

"Our Broken Constitution" likely shares similar arguments, critiquing the current interpretation and execution of the Constitution, which has led to an expansion of federal powers. This expansion of federal powers has occurred since the American Civil War, with some periods where the legislative branch was more powerful or states' rights proponents successfully limited federal power.

One example of the federal government's absolute power is its authority over taxation. Brutus argues that there is no limit to the legislative power to lay taxes, duties, imposts, and excises. While the federal government shares this power with the states, it can also eradicate direct taxation by state governments. Additionally, the federal government has the power to coin money and regulate its value, further solidifying its financial control.

Another area where the federal government holds significant power is in the creation and enforcement of laws. While Congress has the power to create laws, the executive branch under the President can veto this legislation. However, Congress can override the President's veto, demonstrating the potential for the federal government to act without checks and balances. This concentration of power is a key concern for Brutus, who believes that a diverse range of opinions is necessary for a successful federal government.

Explore related products

BRUTUS(ブルータス) 2025年 10月1日号 No.1039 [秋から冬のワードローブ。GOOD STYLE for Mr. BRUTUS] [雑誌] (Japanese Edition)

$5.25

BRUTUS(ブルータス) 2025年 11月1日号 No.1041 [ラブソング] [雑誌] (Japanese Edition)

$4.75

BRUTUS(ブルータス) 2025年 7月1日号 No.1033 [星野源と、音楽と。] [雑誌] (Japanese Edition)

$4.87

BRUTUS(ブルータス) 2025年 5月1日号 No.1029 [韓国の今を誰も知らない！] [雑誌] (Japanese Edition)

$4.87

BRUTUS(ブルータス) 2025年 1月15日号 No.1022 [わたしが知らない坂本龍一。] [雑誌] (Japanese Edition)

$5.11

BRUTUS(ブルータス) 2025年 8月1日号 No.1035 [いま、バンコクに行きたい理由。] [雑誌] (Japanese Edition)

$4.89

The Necessary and Proper Clause

This clause has been interpreted as granting Congress implied powers in addition to its enumerated powers. The Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 is a landmark example of this interpretation, where the Court ruled that Congress had the implied power to establish a bank as it was a "proper and suitable instrument" to aid in its power to tax and spend. This case demonstrated the broad authority given to Congress to determine what is "necessary" for implementing federal powers.

On the other hand, Federalists like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison defended the clause, arguing that it would only permit the execution of powers granted by the Constitution. Madison even asserted that without the clause, the Constitution would be a "dead letter." This clash of opinions highlights the ongoing debate regarding the balance of power between the federal government and the states, with the Necessary and Proper Clause playing a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of congressional powers.

Large republic governance

Brutus No. 1 and Our Broken Constitution both express concerns about the challenges of governing a large republic. They argue that a large republic with diverse interests and opinions will face challenges in governing effectively.

Brutus No. 1, written by Robert Yates, is one of the most important Anti-Federalist writings. It argues against the ratification of the US Constitution, which Yates believed would lead to the creation of a powerful federal government and the erosion of state powers. One of the key concerns raised by Brutus is the issue of large republic governance. According to Brutus, a large republic, such as the proposed consolidation of the thirteen states, would face challenges due to the diversity of opinions and interests within its borders. Brutus argued that "the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar in a republic", and that a large nation with diverse opinions and interests would result in constant clashes and weak government.

Our Broken Constitution, likely referring to the US Constitution, shares similar concerns about the challenges of governing a large republic. It is implied that a large republic, such as the United States, faces difficulties in effectively representing the diverse interests and opinions of its citizens. This can lead to conflicts and challenges in governance, as predicted by Brutus.

Both Brutus No. 1 and Our Broken Constitution warn against the potential negative consequences of consolidating power in a large republic. They argue that a diverse range of opinions and interests within a large republic can lead to constant clashes and weak government. In Brutus' view, a large republic would require a strong central government, which could lead to tyranny and the erosion of state powers. Similarly, Our Broken Constitution likely criticizes the concentration of power in a large republic, suggesting that it can lead to ineffective governance and a disconnect from the people.

The similarities between Brutus No. 1 and Our Broken Constitution lie in their recognition of the challenges inherent in governing a large and diverse republic. They caution against the consolidation of power in a central government, predicting that it will lead to conflicts, weak governance, and a potential loss of liberty. Both texts emphasize the importance of considering the diverse interests and opinions of the people when forming a government that truly represents them.

In conclusion, Brutus No. 1 and Our Broken Constitution share concerns about the difficulties of governing a large republic with diverse interests and opinions. They argue that consolidating power in a central government can lead to conflicts, weak governance, and a potential threat to liberty. These texts highlight the ongoing challenges of governing large and diverse nations, and their warnings remain relevant in modern discussions of federalism and state rights.

Frequently asked questions