Meta Tags And Trademark Infringement: What's The Legal Risk?

The use of trademarks in meta tags is a complex issue that varies across jurisdictions. Generally, a meta tag is a piece of HTML code embedded in a web page that identifies the content contained within the site. While it is not always trademark infringement to use a trademark in a meta tag, it can be illegal in certain circumstances, particularly when it deceptively lures users away from the trademark owner's website and towards another site. This is known as initial interest confusion, which some courts, such as in the US, have recognised as constituting trademark infringement. However, there are also cases where using a trademark in a meta tag is permitted under fair use laws, such as when the trademark is used to describe goods, services, or geographic locations.

Explore related products

Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Reference

$28.45 $49.99

Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks For Dummies

$24.98 $29.99

Trademark: Legal Care for Your Business & Product Name

$30.42 $39.99

Trademark Law: An Open-Access Casebook (Version 12) (2025): Volume 1

$21.7

Trademark Beauty Hair Waver - Double Barrel Hair Crimper, Beach Waves Curling Iron, Babe Waves X, Adjustable Temperature Hair Curler, Hair Styling Tools, 1.25" - Black

$89

The Trademark Guide: How You Can Protect and Profit from Trademarks (Third Edition) (Allworth Intellectual Property Made Easy Series)

$17.65 $19.99

Trademark law and infringement

Trademark law protects a trademark owner's exclusive right to use a trademark when another's use of the mark is likely to cause consumer confusion , deception, or mistake about the source or origin of goods and services. This is the key factor in determining trademark infringement.

Trademark infringement is the unauthorized use of a trademark or service mark, which may be a logo, brand symbol, or keyword, in connection with goods or services. This use may lead to confusion, deception, or misunderstanding about the actual company a product or service originated from. The use of a trademark that looks very similar to a registered trademark may also constitute infringement.

Trademark infringement may occur when a company uses a trademarked term in the meta tag of a website to deceptively lure users away from the site that owns the trademark. This is a form of unfair competition, and courts have held that this type of infringement is actionable. The use of trademarks in meta tags to divert traffic from a legitimate site to another website violates trademark rights and can result in legal consequences. However, not all uses of trademarks in meta tags are illegal. The fair use doctrine permits the use of trademarks to describe a company's goods or services or the company's geographic origin.

To support a trademark infringement claim in court, a plaintiff must prove that they own a valid mark, that their rights to the mark take priority over the defendant's, and that the defendant's mark is likely to cause confusion in the minds of consumers about the source or sponsorship of the goods or services offered. The plaintiff must also demonstrate that the infringing activities have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. If infringement is proven, remedies may include a court order for the defendant to stop using the mark, monetary relief, and the destruction or forfeiture of infringing articles.

Meta tags and their use

Meta tags are snippets of text that act as content descriptors. They are embedded in the HTML code of websites and help search engines index web pages. Meta tags may include trademarks, and their use in this context can be a powerful tool for improving a website's search engine ranking. However, it is important to note that using trademarks in meta tags can also lead to legal issues, particularly if it is done with the intention of confusing search engines or diverting traffic away from the trademark owner's website.

Trademark infringement is defined as the unauthorised reproduction or use of a trademark, and it can have serious legal consequences. While the law regarding trademark usage in meta tags varies across jurisdictions, there have been several cases where courts have found that using a trademark in a meta tag constitutes infringement. For example, in Brookfield Communications Inc. v. West Coast Ent. Corp., the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the use of the trademark "MovieBuff" in meta-tags by the defendant infringed on the plaintiff's rights. Similarly, in Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd, it was found that Liv Pty Ltd infringed on Accor's trademark "Harbour Lights" by using it in their meta tags, even though the trademark was not immediately visible to users.

To avoid potential trademark infringement when using meta tags, it is important to obtain consent from the trademark owner. Additionally, fair use laws may apply if the trademark is used to describe a company's goods, services, or geographic location. However, if a website operator improperly uses meta tags with the intention of drawing customers away from competitors, they may be found guilty of trademark infringement and face legal repercussions.

In summary, while meta tags can be a powerful tool for improving search engine rankings, their use must be careful and ethical to avoid trademark infringement. Website owners should instruct their IT teams or web developers to avoid using other businesses' trademarks without permission and monitor their meta tags to ensure compliance.

Legal consequences of infringement

Trademark infringement is the unauthorized use of a trademark or service mark. This use can be in connection with goods or services and may lead to confusion, deception, or a misunderstanding about the actual company a product or service originated from. Trademark infringement may result in legal consequences such as:

• Monetary reimbursement for losses to the plaintiff.
• An injunction requiring the defendant to stop producing, using, or distributing goods with the trademark.
• Seizure of goods that use or incorporate the unauthorized trademark.
• A court order can prevent a defendant from using the mark, and the owner may be awarded monetary relief.

The central focus of any trademark infringement claim is the likelihood of confusion. A likelihood of confusion exists when consumers viewing the allegedly infringing mark would probably assume that the product or service it represents is associated with the source of a different product or service identified with a similar mark. Courts conducting a likelihood of confusion analysis will apply two different standards, depending on whether the accused item directly competes with the trademarked item. If the goods in question are completely unrelated to the goods and services provided, the court will typically find that confusion is unlikely and, therefore, there is no infringement.

In addition to claiming likelihood of confusion, a trademark owner may claim trademark "dilution," asserting that it owns a famous mark and that the use of the mark diminishes the strength or value of the trademark owner's mark by "blurring" the mark's distinctiveness or "tarnishing" the mark's image by connecting it to something distasteful or objectionable—even if there is no likelihood of confusion.

In the case of meta tags, the use of a trademarked term in the meta tag of a website may be considered trademark infringement if it deceptively lures users towards a certain website and away from the site that owns the trademark. This is known as blurring and occurs if the infringer's use is similar or confusing to users. However, not all uses of another company's trademark in meta tags are illegal. The fair use doctrine is often used to defend against these trademark infringement lawsuits. When trademarks are only used to describe a company's goods or services or the company's geographic origin, they will be permitted under trademark laws as fair use.

Explore related products

Marks of Excellence: The History and Taxonomy of Trademarks

$50.61 $75

Intellectual Property: A Quickstudy Laminated Law Reference Guide

$7.95

Understanding Trademark Law (Understanding Series)

$55

Trademark Law: An Open-Access Casebook (Version 12) (2025): Volume 2

$11.22

Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age 2025 Vol. II Copyrights, Trademarks and State IP Protections: Vol. II Copyrights, Trademarks and State IP Protections

$9.99 $42

Intellectual Property In the Digital Age [Edition 2024]: A Practical Guide on Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, and Protecting Confidential Information [AI Insight Bonus]

$49.97

Fair use and permission

The use of trademarks in meta tags without permission can be considered trademark infringement in certain circumstances. This occurs when the use of the trademark deceptively lures users away from the trademark owner's site and towards another site. However, the ""fair use" doctrine allows for the use of trademarks without permission under certain conditions.

The "fair use" doctrine provides a legal defence against trademark infringement claims. It recognises that trademarks cannot be used to prevent others from using words or symbols in their plain and ordinary meaning. For example, if a trademark is a descriptive word or common symbol, such as a pine tree, it falls under fair use. The less distinctive or original the trademark, the less control the trademark owner has over its use.

There are two main types of fair use: descriptive fair use and nominative fair use. Descriptive fair use refers to using a trademark as a descriptor rather than as a trademark. For instance, describing a component within a dehumidifier as "honeycomb-shaped" was considered fair use of the trademark HONEYCOMBE dehumidifiers. Nominative fair use, on the other hand, involves referencing a trademark to identify the actual goods and services associated with the mark. For example, it is permissible to refer to a printer produced by Casio as a "Casio printer". Nominative fair use is generally allowed as long as the product or service cannot be easily identified without using the trademark, only the necessary portion of the mark is used, and the use does not imply sponsorship or endorsement by the trademark owner. Nominative fair use is commonly applied in comparative advertising, parody, and non-commercial use in academic articles, media reports, etc.

In the context of meta tags, the use of a trademark may be considered fair use if it is used to describe a company's goods, services, or geographic origin. For example, "Amazon" can be used in meta tags to describe goods or services from the Amazon rainforest, as in the case of Amazon.com. However, it is important to note that using a trademark in meta tags to divert traffic from a legitimate site to another website violates trademark rights and can lead to legal repercussions.

To avoid potential trademark infringement when using meta tags, it is advisable to obtain consent from the trademark owner. Website operators can also consider properly indexing their data and including a disclaimer on their website to reduce liability for keyword use. Additionally, embedding your mark, name, and related generic keywords as HTML text in the title page, meta-tags, and headlines can help improve search engine rankings without resorting to the use of trademarks.

Case studies on infringement rulings

The use of trademarks in meta tags has been a contentious issue, with several court cases ruling on this matter. One notable case is Brookfield Communications Inc. v. West Coast Ent. Corp. [(1999)]. In this case, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the defendant's use of the domain name "moviebuff.com" and the meta-tag "MovieBuff" infringed on the plaintiff's registered trademark "MovieBuff". This decision set a precedent by acknowledging that using another's trademark in a meta-tag could cause initial interest confusion, which is actionable under the Federal Trademark Act.

Another case that addressed meta tag infringement is Kapil Wadhwa & Ors. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. In this instance, the plaintiff argued that the defendants were meta-tagging their registered marks, causing infringement. The court ruled in favour of the plaintiff and granted an injunction, preventing the defendants from using the registered marks in their meta-tags.

In the case of People Interactive (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Gaurav Jerry, the defendant's use of the plaintiff's registered mark "shaadi.com" in their meta-tags diverted internet traffic from the plaintiff's site. The court recognised that this diluted and damaged the unique nature of the plaintiff's mark, and ruled in their favour.

Additionally, in India, Section 29 of the Trademark Act outlines trademark infringement, specifically mentioning the use of a registered trademark in the course of business without being the registered proprietor. This includes utilising another's trademark to obtain an unfair advantage or in a way that harms the mark's distinctive character or reputation.

These cases highlight the legal consequences of improperly using trademarks in meta tags, with courts recognising the potential for deception and unfair competition. To avoid infringement, it is essential to obtain consent from the trademark owner or ensure that the use falls under fair use, such as describing a company's goods, services, or geographic origin.

Frequently asked questions