The Constitution And Slavery: A Historical Examination

The original United States Constitution did not contain the words slave or slavery within its text. However, it directly dealt with American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution in other places in the document. The Constitution includes provisions related to slavery, such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Fugitive Slave Clause, and the Importation Clause. These provisions demonstrate how the framers dealt with the controversial issue of slavery at the time.

Explore related products

The Interbellum Constitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms (Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference)

$36.99 $45

The U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Pocket Size (Annotated)

$7.49

The Constitution of the Pennsylvania Society, for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, and the Relief of Free Negroes, Unlawfully Held in Bondage: ... Twenty-Third of April, 1787 (Classic Reprint)

$29.57 $23.27

Lincoln's Constitution

$8.24 $17

Constitution of the Baptist Anti-Slavery Society, Providence: Formed December 12, 1839; With an Address to the First, Second, Third and Fourth Baptist Churches (Classic Reprint)

$18.57 $22.97

Slavery and the Founders

$33.18 $62.99

The word 'slavery' does not appear in the US Constitution

The original United States Constitution did not contain the word "slavery" or "slave" within its text. However, it directly dealt with American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution in other parts of the document. The Constitution, drafted in 1787 and ratified in 1789, was the work of men with differing views on slavery. As such, it could be—and was—interpreted as both pro-slavery and anti-slavery.

The Constitution included three significant provisions related to slavery: the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Fugitive Slave Clause, and the Importation Clause. The Three-Fifths Compromise, a concept that predated the Constitutional Convention, specified that for representation in Congress, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This was a compromise between Northern states, which did not want slaves counted, and Southern states, which wanted to maximise their political representation. The Fugitive Slave Clause enforced the return of escaped slaves, thereby protecting slave owners' interests. The Importation Clause allowed the importation of slaves until 1808, indicating the acceptance of slavery in commerce until that time.

The Fifth Amendment, which declares that "no person" could be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, has been interpreted as both supporting and opposing slavery. In Dred Scott v. Sandford, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney held that "the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution". On the other hand, some argued that the principle of fundamental human equality was embodied in the Constitution, with the Preamble stating that the purpose of the federal government was to "secure the blessings of liberty".

The complex attitudes and political negotiations among the framers of the Constitution resulted in the omission of the term "slavery". The issue of slavery was fiercely debated during the Constitutional Convention, and the document contained references and protections for enslavement. The delegates reached a compromise, agreeing that for 20 years—until 1808—there would be no restriction on the slave trade, and in return, the federal government could make laws requiring American ships to be used in all commerce. This compromise, along with the Three-Fifths Compromise, created the "Slave Power" in the legislature, allowing bills favourable to the southern region to pass more easily in Congress.

The Constitution indirectly refers to slavery and protects slaveholders' rights

The United States Constitution, the foundational document of the country, does not explicitly mention the word "slavery." However, it indirectly refers to the institution of slavery and includes provisions that protect the rights of slaveholders. While the framers of the Constitution deliberately avoided using the term "slavery," the language and compromises within the document reflect the reality of slavery's existence and its centrality to the economic and social fabric of the early American nation.

One of the most explicit references to slavery in the Constitution is in the Three-Fifths Compromise, which is part of Article I, Section 2. This compromise stated that for the purposes of representation in the House of Representatives and direct taxation, slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This provision gave Southern states, where slavery was prevalent, greater representation in Congress and acknowledged the economic value of slaves without directly referring to them as property.

The Constitution also includes a number of provisions that protect the institution of slavery and the rights of slaveholders. For example, the Fugitive Slave Clause, found in Article IV, Section 2, requires that escaped slaves be returned to their owners, even if they have fled to a state where slavery is illegal. This clause effectively made slavery a national institution, as it required all states, regardless of their own laws, to cooperate in the return of escaped slaves.

Additionally, the Constitution prohibited Congress from banning the importation of slaves until 1808, ensuring that the slave trade could continue unimpeded for at least 20 years after the ratification of the document. This provision, found in Article I, Section 9, was a concession to Southern states, which relied heavily on the importation of enslaved people to support their economy.

While the Constitution stopped short of directly addressing slavery, its impact on the institution was significant. The document laid the foundation for a nation in which slavery was legally protected and entrenched, and it reflected the compromises made between the North and the South to ensure the unity and stability of the young republic. The indirect references to slavery in the Constitution highlight the complex and contentious nature of the issue during the nation's founding, and the lasting impact it had on the country's development.

In conclusion, while the word "slavery" itself does not appear in the Constitution, the document makes indirect references to the institution and includes protections for the rights of slaveholders. These provisions reflect the reality of slavery's existence in the early United States and the compromises made to balance the interests of the North and the South during the nation's formative years. The Constitution's impact on slavery was significant, and its legacy continues to shape discussions and debates around race, equality, and justice in the United States today.

The Three-Fifths Compromise allowed Southern states to count slaves as three-fifths of a person for representation in Congress

The United States Constitution, drafted in 1787 and ratified in 1789, did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery" within its text. However, it directly addressed American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution in other parts of the document. The Three-Fifths Compromise was one such provision.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention regarding the inclusion of slaves in a state's total population. This count would determine the number of seats in the House of Representatives, the number of electoral votes each state would be allocated, and how much money the states would pay in taxes. Slaveholding states wanted their entire population to be counted to determine the number of Representatives they could elect and send to Congress. Free states, on the other hand, wanted to exclude the counting of slave populations in slave states, as those slaves had no voting rights.

The compromise struck was to count three-fifths of each state's slave population toward that state's total population for the purpose of apportioning the House of Representatives. This effectively gave the Southern states more power in the House relative to the Northern states. The additional seats in Congress that Southern states gained with the Three-Fifths Compromise created the "Slave Power" in the legislature and allowed bills favourable to the Southern region to pass more easily.

It is important to note that the three-fifths number did not imply that enslaved people were considered three-fifths human. Instead, the number was derived from an approximation of the wealth that an enslaved person contributed to the state's economy. The Three-Fifths Compromise, therefore, provided reduced representation in the House of Representatives for slave states compared to free states.

Explore related products

The Sources of Anti-Slavery Constitutionalism in America, 1760-1848

$5 $24.95

The Concepts of Freedom and Equality in the American Constitution: Slavery's Impact on a Paradigmatic Constitutional Shift in the Context of Current Debates on Reparations

$66.67 $65.9

View of the Constitution of the United States: With Selected Writings

$14.5 $14.5

Act of Incorporation and Constitution of the Pennsylvania Society, for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery: And for the Relief of Free Negroes ... the Condition of the African Race ..

$22.95 $23.57

The Constitution in Congress: Democrats and Whigs, 1829–1861 (Volume 3)

$2.99 $34

Federalism: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Reference Guides to the United States Constitution)

$99 $110

The Fugitive Slave Clause enforced the return of escaped slaves to their owners

The original United States Constitution did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery" within its text. However, it did include the Fugitive Slave Clause, which enforced the return of escaped slaves to their owners. This clause, also known as Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3, stated that "no person held to service or labour" would be released from bondage if they escaped to a free state. In other words, if an enslaved person fled to a state where slavery had been banned, they could still be legally recaptured and returned to their owner.

The inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause in the Constitution was a result of pressure from Southern politicians, who were concerned that the creation of free states would lead to an increase in runaway slaves. Despite this, anti-slavery sentiments remained strong in the North, and many continued to petition Congress to abolish slavery altogether. The Fugitive Slave Clause was further strengthened by the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, which provided more detailed instructions on how the law should be enforced. This Act allowed local governments to seize escaped slaves and return them to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their escape.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 faced significant criticism and resistance, particularly from Northern states. Many viewed the law as legalized kidnapping and refused to comply with it. This resistance led to the creation of safe houses and underground networks to aid enslaved people in their escape to the North. In response, Southern politicians pushed for even stronger fugitive slave laws, arguing that Northern abolitionists were stirring up their slaves and interfering with "Southern property rights".

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was enacted to address the perceived weaknesses of the original Act. This new law placed control of individual cases in the hands of federal commissioners, who were incentivized financially to return suspected runaways to their owners. The Act also penalized officials who failed to arrest individuals suspected of escaping slavery, making them liable for a fine of $1,000 (equivalent to $37,800 in 2024). Law enforcement officials could arrest suspected runaways based solely on a claimant's sworn testimony of ownership, and the accused were not permitted to testify in their defence.

The Fugitive Slave Clause and the subsequent Fugitive Slave Acts played a significant role in enforcing the return of escaped slaves to their owners. These laws made it extremely difficult for enslaved people to find refuge within the United States and highlighted the contentious nature of slavery in the country's early history.

The Importation Clause allowed the importation of slaves until 1808

The United States Constitution, drafted in 1787, did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery". However, it directly addressed American slavery in at least five provisions and indirectly protected the institution in other sections of the document. One of these provisions was the Migration or Importation Clause (Article I, Section 9), which allowed the importation of slaves until 1808.

The Importation Clause, also known as the Migration Clause, was a compromise reached by the delegates at the Constitutional Convention. It was a result of fierce debates over the issue of slavery, with some delegates owning slaves and others having feelings against the practice. South Carolina and Georgia delegates threatened to withdraw their states from the union if there were restrictions imposed on the Transatlantic Slave Trade. On the other hand, Luther Martin of Maryland, a slaveholder himself, argued that the slave trade was inconsistent with the principles of the American Revolution and should be regulated by the federal government.

The Importation Clause was part of the compromise reached at the Constitutional Convention, which allowed for the continuation of the slave trade for 20 years until 1808. This compromise ensured that the federal government could make laws requiring American ships to be used in all commerce, benefiting shipbuilders and maritime workers in the northeast region.

The Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves, passed by Congress in 1807, made it illegal to import slaves into the United States as of January 1, 1808. This legislation was promoted by President Thomas Jefferson, who had advocated for it since the 1770s. However, it is important to note that this act did not end slavery or the domestic sale of slaves within the United States.

Despite the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves, the illegal importation of slaves into the United States continued after 1808. Historians estimate that up to 50,000 slaves were smuggled into the country, mainly through Spanish Florida and Texas before they became states. Additionally, American citizens were involved in the slave trade by transporting Africans to other countries, such as Cuba and Brazil, even after the abolition of the slave trade in the United States.

Frequently asked questions