President's Role In Amending The Constitution

The process of amending the US Constitution is a difficult and time-consuming endeavour, requiring a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. While the Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in this process, some Presidents have played an informal, ministerial role by transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for ratification. The Supreme Court, however, has clarified that the President holds no formal constitutional role in amending the Constitution, as exemplified in the 1920 Hawke v. Smith case.

Explore related products

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.21

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$105.39 $150

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

The President's signature is not required

The US Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in the process of amending the Constitution. The President's signature is not required for the proposal or ratification of an amendment. This was articulated by the Judicial Branch and upheld by the Supreme Court in the 1798 case Hollingsworth v. Virginia.

In modern federal law, the Archivist of the United States is responsible for certifying a state's ratification of a constitutional amendment. The certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice that the amendment process has been completed. The signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function attended by various dignitaries, including the President.

While the President's signature is not required, there have been instances of Presidents playing an informal, ministerial role in the amendment process. For example, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, and President Jimmy Carter signed a joint resolution to extend the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, despite being advised that his signature was unnecessary.

Additionally, President George Washington sent the first twelve proposed amendments, including the ten proposals that later became the Bill of Rights, to the states for ratification after Congress approved them. This role of transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification has been played by several Presidents.

The President's role is informal and ministerial

The US Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in amending the Constitution. However, several Presidents have played an informal and ministerial role in the amendment process. This role has been described as transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification.

For example, President George Washington sent the first twelve proposed amendments, including the ten proposals that became the Bill of Rights, to the states for ratification after Congress approved them. Similarly, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, even though his signature was not required for its proposal or ratification. President Jimmy Carter also signed a joint resolution to extend the deadline for ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, despite being advised that his signature was unnecessary.

In modern times, the President may be present during the ceremonial signing of the certification of a new amendment. For instance, President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has maintained that the President has no formal constitutional role in the amendment process. The Court's decision in the 1920 Hawke v. Smith case further clarified that the President's submission of a constitutional amendment is not required.

Presidents have transmitted amendments to states

While the Constitution does not outline a role for the President in amending it, some Presidents have played a ministerial role in transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification. This is despite the fact that the President's signature is not required for the proposal or ratification of an amendment.

For example, President George Washington sent the first twelve proposed amendments, including the ten proposals that later became the Bill of Rights, to the states for ratification after they were approved by Congress. Similarly, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery.

In modern times, the Archivist of the United States is responsible for certifying a state's ratification of a constitutional amendment. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large, serving as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process is complete. In recent history, the signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function that may be attended by the President. For example, President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment.

Although the President does not have a formal role in amending the Constitution, they can endorse the idea of an amendment, such as President Clinton's endorsement of a crime victims' rights amendment.

Explore related products

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

The United States Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Large Print Edition (Annotated)

$9.99

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.59 $180

The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought

$95

The President cannot veto a proposed amendment

The President of the United States does not have a formal role in amending the Constitution. The Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in this process. While the President can play an informal and ministerial role in transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification, their signature is not required for the proposal or ratification of an amendment.

This interpretation is supported by the Supreme Court's decision in the 1920 Hawke v. Smith case, which established that the submission of a constitutional amendment does not require the action of the President. Additionally, in the 1798 case Hollingsworth v. Virginia, the Court held that the Eleventh Amendment had been "constitutionally adopted" without requiring the President's involvement. These precedents reinforce the understanding that the President cannot veto a proposed amendment.

Historically, some Presidents have played a role in transmitting proposed amendments to the states for ratification. For example, President George Washington sent the first twelve proposed amendments, including the ten proposals that became the Bill of Rights, to the states for ratification after Congressional approval. However, this role is now largely ceremonial, as the Archivist of the United States is responsible for certifying a state's ratification of a constitutional amendment under modern federal law.

The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately difficult and time-consuming. A proposed amendment must pass with a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and then be ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states. This rigorous process ensures that amendments have a significant impact on the nation and secure the rights of citizens.

The President can endorse ideas for amendments

While the US Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in amending the Constitution, Presidents have played an informal and ministerial role in the amendment process. For example, President George Washington sent the first twelve proposed amendments, including the ten proposals that later became the Bill of Rights, to the states for ratification after Congress approved them. Similarly, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, even though his signature was not required for its proposal or ratification.

In modern times, President Clinton has endorsed the idea of a crime victims' rights amendment. The President can also play a role in witnessing the certification of amendments. For example, President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment. Additionally, in recent history, the signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function that the President may attend.

Although the President can endorse ideas for amendments, the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process. The joint resolution for an amendment does not require the President's signature or approval. The original document is sent directly to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication.

Frequently asked questions