Constitutional Monarchy: Limited Power, Explained

Constitutional monarchy, also known as limited monarchy, is a form of government in which a monarch shares power with a constitutionally organized government. The monarch is bound to exercise their powers and authorities within limits prescribed by an established legal framework. While some constitutional monarchies, like Liechtenstein and Monaco, grant substantial discretionary powers to the sovereign, others, like the United Kingdom and Japan, retain significantly less personal discretion in the exercise of their authority. The power of a constitutional monarch is limited by a set of laws and basic principles, or the constitution, and they often serve as ceremonial figures or symbolic heads of state.

Explore related products

The Monarchy and the Constitution

$78 $78

On Power

$18.35 $26.99

Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary

$11.82 $14.5

The History of Constitutional Monarchy in England (1689 to 1837): William and Mary to William IV

$0.99

Roots of the First American Republic 1745-1775

$5 $10

The Difference Between an Absolute and Limited Monarchy, as It More Particularly Regards the English Constitution; Being a Treatise

$25.95

Constitutional monarchy vs absolute monarchy

A constitutional monarchy, also known as a limited monarchy, is a form of monarchy in which the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution and other laws. The monarch shares power with an elected parliament and acts as a ceremonial head of state. Constitutional monarchies can be further divided into executive (or semi-constitutional) and ceremonial monarchies. In executive monarchies, the monarch wields significant power and the monarchy is a powerful political and social institution. Examples of executive monarchies include Liechtenstein and Monaco, where the ruling monarchs have significant executive power. However, they are not considered absolute monarchs as their power is limited by the constitution and they are not the sole decision-makers. On the other hand, in ceremonial monarchies, the monarch holds little or no actual power but may still have social and cultural influence. Examples of ceremonial monarchies include the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, and Japan, where the monarch's power is largely symbolic and they have little to no personal discretion in exercising their authority.

In contrast, an absolute monarchy is a form of government in which the monarch holds supreme power and is the sole decision-maker. The monarch in an absolute monarchy rules as a dictator and has unlimited power that is not bound by any constitution or laws. While some absolute monarchies may have a constitution, it does not limit the power of the monarch. Absolute monarchies were more common in the past, with most transitioning to constitutional monarchies or other forms of government in the modern era. Examples of former absolute monarchies include the German Empire (1871-1918), France during the Ancien Régime, and Hawaii from its founding in 1810 until 1840.

The main difference between constitutional and absolute monarchy lies in the extent of the monarch's power and the presence of a constitution or other legal framework that limits that power. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's power is limited and shared with other institutions, such as an elected parliament, while in an absolute monarchy, the monarch holds all the power and is not bound by any laws or constitution.

While some argue that a benevolent absolute monarch can be the best form of government, the lack of checks and balances in an absolute monarchy raises concerns about accountability and the potential for misconduct. On the other hand, constitutional monarchies are seen as more stable and democratic, as they provide a balance between the power of the monarch and the elected representatives of the people.

Executive vs ceremonial monarchy

There are two types of constitutional monarchy: executive and ceremonial.

In an executive monarchy, also known as a semi-constitutional monarchy, the monarch has significant, though not absolute, power. The monarchy is a powerful political and social institution. Liechtenstein and Monaco are examples of executive monarchies, where the ruling monarchs wield significant executive power. However, while they are very powerful in their small states, they are not absolute monarchs and have limited de facto power compared to Islamic monarchs.

In a ceremonial monarchy, the monarch holds little or no political power but often has social and cultural influence. The monarch acts as a non-party political ceremonial head of state under the constitution. The United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, Japan, and Thailand are examples of constitutional monarchies where the monarch has little to no discretionary power. The British monarch, for example, has a ceremonial role, with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom exercising powers under "royal (or Crown) prerogative".

While the powers of the monarch differ between countries, the prime minister typically holds the day-to-day powers of governance in constitutional monarchies. For instance, while the King of Norway chairs special meetings, in Belgium and Denmark, the monarch appoints a representative to preside over the creation of a coalition government following a parliamentary election.

Some countries with a provincial system have a mix of executive and ceremonial monarchies. For example, Indonesia and South Africa are presidential republics with provinces that have monarchs as ceremonial heads.

Liberal democracies and constitutional monarchy

Liberal democracy traces its origins to 18th-century Europe, also known as the Age of Enlightenment. At the time, most European states were monarchies, with political power held by either the monarch or the aristocracy. Liberal democracy emerged as a challenge to these conventional views, advocated by a small group of Enlightenment intellectuals.

One of the most influential philosophers of this time was English empiricist John Locke, who refuted monarchical absolutism in his "Two Treatises of Government". Locke argued that governments were only legitimate if they maintained the consent of the governed. These ideas influenced the American and French Revolutions, which put the principles of the Enlightenment philosophers into practice and gave birth to the philosophy of liberalism.

Constitutional monarchy, also known as limited monarchy, parliamentary monarchy, or democratic monarchy, is a form of monarchy in which the monarch's power is limited by a written constitution or unwritten constitutional conventions. The monarch exercises their authority in accordance with a constitution and is not the sole decision-maker. Constitutional monarchies differ from absolute monarchies, in which the monarch holds absolute and unlimited power.

In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch may be a hereditary symbolic head of state, such as an emperor, king, queen, prince, or grand duke. They primarily perform representative and civic roles, embodying national unity and providing constitutional continuity in times of emergency. The monarch may hold formal powers, such as dissolving parliament or giving royal assent to legislation, but these powers are generally exercised in accordance with constitutional principles rather than personal political preferences.

Liberal democracies can take various constitutional forms, including constitutional monarchy or republic, and can have a parliamentary, presidential, or semi-presidential system. Constitutional monarchies range from countries where the constitution grants substantial discretionary powers to the sovereign, such as Liechtenstein and Monaco, to countries where the monarch's power is more limited, such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Japan.

Explore related products

The Fall of Republics: A History from Ancient Carthage to the American Constitution

$19.25 $35

Limited Monarchy: Or, Ruling Self

$29.95

Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture (Princeton Studies in International History and Politics Book 120)

$41.78 $47

Citizen Marx: Republicanism and the Formation of Karl Marx’s Social and Political Thought

$27.05 $39.95

Monarchy in the Age of Liberty: Royal power and public life in eighteenth-century Sweden (Lund University Press)

$36.95

The Role of the Executive, Legislative, Judiciary, and Constitutional Monarchy in Governing Malaysia: Keynote Address by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Fourth ... Malaysia (Perdana Discourse Series Book 9)

$0.99

The role of the monarch

The monarch's role is primarily to embody the national character and provide constitutional continuity in times of emergency. They act as a focus for national identity, unity, and pride, giving a sense of stability and continuity. This role is especially important during times of political turmoil, when the monarch can help to stabilize the country.

The monarch also has constitutional and representational duties, which have developed over the history of the monarchy. These duties include officially recognizing success and excellence and supporting the ideal of voluntary service. The monarch's family often supports them in these duties and responsibilities.

In some countries, such as Liechtenstein and Monaco, the ruling monarchs have significant discretionary and executive power, although they are not absolute monarchs and their de facto power is limited. In other countries, like the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, and Japan, the monarch has little to no personal discretion in the exercise of their authority.

Historical context

The concept of a constitutional monarchy, also known as a limited monarchy, parliamentary monarchy, or democratic monarchy, emerged in the 18th century and gained prominence in the 20th century, replacing most absolute monarchies. A constitutional monarchy is a system of government where the monarch exercises their authority in accordance with a constitution and shares power with a constitutionally organized government. The monarch is bound by a set of laws and principles that limit their power and is not the sole decision-maker.

The historical evolution of constitutional monarchies can be traced back to the philosophical justifications provided by German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel in his work "Elements of the Philosophy of Right" in 1820. Hegel envisioned a constitutional monarch with limited powers, serving to embody the national character and provide stability during emergencies. This concept aligned with the evolving political theories and Protestant Christian views of natural law at the time.

During the 11th century to the middle of the 18th century, the modern state was predominantly an absolute monarchy, with monarchs holding sovereign power. However, even within these absolute monarchies, there were limitations on the monarch's power. For example, the 1215 Magna Carta, signed by the English king, was considered a contract that constrained the king's power while retaining his sovereignty.

The establishment of the German Empire (the Second Reich) in 1871 marked a significant shift towards constitutional monarchy. The 1871 Constitution of the German Empire did not grant sovereignty to Emperor William I, as it placed legislative power in the Federal Council and the Imperial Diet, demonstrating the limited power of the monarch.

Over time, countries like the United Kingdom, Belgium, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and Japan transitioned from absolute monarchies to constitutional monarchies, where the monarch's power is significantly reduced or ceremonial. In these countries, the monarch may retain limited legislative and executive powers, but the ability to make and pass legislation resides with an elected parliament or other governing bodies.

Frequently asked questions