
Federal judges in the United States are required to take an oath of office before executing their duties, which includes swearing to uphold the Constitution and administer justice without respect to persons, as well as performing their duties faithfully and impartially. This oath is a solemn pledge that serves as a cornerstone of the American judicial system, ensuring that those who preside over courts across the nation are committed to impartiality and the rule of law enshrined in the Constitution. The specific phrasing of the oath can vary slightly, but the underlying commitment to defend the Constitution remains a consistent and fundamental aspect of the judicial role.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Oath | "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God." |
| Who it applies to | Each justice or judge of the United States |
| Who administers the oath | The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, but not always |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- Federal judges must take an oath to uphold the US Constitution before performing their duties
- The oath includes swearing to administer justice without respect to persons
- The oath also includes swearing to protect the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic
- The Attorney General ruled the oath applies to the Chief Justice and Court of Claims judges
- The President-elect is usually sworn in by the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court

Federal judges must take an oath to uphold the US Constitution before performing their duties
> "I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
The specific wording of the oath varies slightly depending on the specific role of the official taking it. For example, the President's oath includes the phrase "that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."
The Constitution does not specify what the swearing-in ceremony must include. Traditionally, the President-elect is sworn in by the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, although this is not always the case. For instance, Lyndon Johnson was sworn in by a US district judge, and Calvin Coolidge was sworn in by his father, who was a notary public and justice of the peace.
Executive Orders: Senate's Approval Needed?
You may want to see also

The oath includes swearing to administer justice without respect to persons
Federal judges in the United States are required to take an oath of office before performing any duties in their position. This oath includes a promise to "administer justice without respect to persons", which means that they will treat all people equally under the law, regardless of their status, wealth, or any other factor. The full oath, as outlined in 28 U.S.C. § 453, states:
> "I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [title] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
This oath is a critical component of the judicial system, ensuring that those in positions of power uphold the principles of equality and impartiality. The phrase "without respect to persons" emphasizes the idea that federal judges must set aside personal biases and prejudices when interpreting the law. This concept is fundamental to the fair and just administration of justice, as it helps to ensure that all individuals are treated equally before the law, regardless of their background or circumstances.
The oath also includes a commitment to "do equal right to the poor and to the rich". This part of the oath underscores the importance of economic equality in the administration of justice. Federal judges are sworn to uphold the rights of all individuals, regardless of their financial status. This aspect of the oath serves as a reminder that justice should be accessible and impartial, regardless of one's socioeconomic position.
Additionally, the oath requires judges to "faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [title] under the Constitution and laws of the United States". This portion of the oath emphasizes the judge's responsibility to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the land. It underscores the importance of judicial restraint and the interpretation of the law within the bounds set by the Constitution. By swearing to uphold the Constitution, federal judges commit to interpreting the law in a manner that aligns with the nation's founding principles.
In conclusion, the oath taken by federal judges, which includes swearing to administer justice without respect to persons, is a critical component of the American judicial system. It ensures that those in positions of power are committed to upholding the principles of equality, impartiality, and justice for all. By taking this oath, federal judges pledge to set aside personal biases, treat all individuals equally before the law, and interpret the law in a manner that aligns with the Constitution and the nation's founding values.
Exploring Supreme Court Duties: Constitutional Focus
You may want to see also

The oath also includes swearing to protect the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic
Federal judges in the United States are required to take an oath of office before performing any duties in their position. This requirement extends to justices and judges of the Court of Claims, Customs Court, and Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, as well as any other court established by an act of Congress.
The oath taken by federal judges includes a promise to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." This aspect of the oath underscores the critical duty of upholding and protecting the Constitution from any and all threats, be they external or internal.
The full text of the oath, as outlined in Title 28, Chapter I, Part 453 of the United States Code, reads:
"I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
It is worth noting that the specific wording of the oath has evolved over time. For instance, during the Civil War, the oath for members of Congress was revised to address concerns about traitors. The current oath for federal judges, as quoted above, emphasizes not only impartial justice but also the defence of the Constitution against all adversaries, underscoring the gravity of their responsibility to safeguard the nation's foundational document.
Federal Courts: Jurisdiction and Constitutional Interpretation
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$24.95

The Attorney General ruled the oath applies to the Chief Justice and Court of Claims judges
Federal law requires justices and judges to take an oath of office before performing their duties. This includes judges of the Court of Claims. The Attorney General has ruled that the expression "any judge of any court of the United States" applies to the Chief Justice and all judges of the Court of Claims. This ruling ensures that the Chief Justice and Court of Claims judges are subject to the same oath requirements as other federal judges.
The oath or affirmation that federal judges take includes a pledge to administer justice impartially and to perform their duties faithfully under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Specifically, the oath states:
> "I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [position] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
This oath is mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 453 and is applicable to justices and judges across the federal judiciary, including the Chief Justice and Court of Claims judges as clarified by the Attorney General's ruling.
It is worth noting that the Chief Judge of a judicial circuit plays a significant role in presiding over meetings of the judicial council and designating their successor upon reaching the age of seventy or by presidential appointment of another judge. This position is distinct from that of the Chief Justice, who is the head of the Supreme Court and oversees the federal judicial system.
The President's Cabinet: Who Are These Select Few?
You may want to see also

The President-elect is usually sworn in by the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court
Federal judges, including Supreme Court Justices, are required to take an oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States. The oath, as outlined in 28 U.S. Code § 453, states:
> "I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
This oath emphasizes the impartiality and equality that justices and judges must uphold in their administration of justice, ensuring that their decisions are based on the Constitution and laws of the nation.
Now, turning to the topic of the President-elect's swearing-in, it is customary for the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court to administer the oath of office to the incoming President. This ceremony marks a significant tradition in American political culture. The President-elect takes the oath of office, as specified in the Constitution, which states:
> "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."
This oath signifies the President-elect's commitment to uphold the nation's highest office and defend the Constitution. While the tradition is for the Chief Justice to preside over this ceremony, there have been exceptions. For instance, Lyndon Johnson was sworn in by Sarah T. Hughes, a US District Judge in Texas, following the assassination of John F. Kennedy. In another instance, Calvin Coolidge was sworn in by his father, a notary public and justice of the peace, after the death of Warren G. Harding.
The swearing-in ceremony of the President-elect holds immense symbolic value, marking the peaceful transition of power and reinforcing the democratic principles upon which the nation was founded. It is a moment that underscores the importance of the Constitution and the rule of law in the United States of America.
The Veto Power: Understanding Legislative Branch's Authority
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Yes, according to US law, federal judges are required to take an oath to uphold the Constitution and laws of the United States.
The oath taken by federal judges includes a pledge to "administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich". They swear to faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon them under their office.
The oath may vary slightly depending on the specific court or jurisdiction. For example, the oath for the Court of Claims includes a reference to the "Court of Claims", while the oath for the Supreme Court may be slightly different.








![The Inside of Mormonism; a Judicial Examination of Endowment Oaths Administered in All the Mormon Temples, by the United States District Court for the Third Judicial District 1903 [Leather Bound]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/617DLHXyzlL._AC_UY218_.jpg)
















