The Constitution's Slavery: A Hidden Truth?

The original United States Constitution, drafted in 1787 and ratified in 1789, did not contain the words slave or slavery within its text. However, it directly addressed American slavery in several provisions and implicitly protected the institution in other parts of the document. The absence of explicit references to slavery in the Constitution has been attributed to the framers' conflicted stance on the issue, with some prioritizing political unity over abolition. The Constitution included clauses such as the Three-Fifths Clause and the Fugitive Slave Clause, which protected slaveholding interests and ensured that slavery remained a national issue. The 13th Amendment, passed in 1865, eventually abolished slavery in the United States, but the question of whether the original Constitution was pro-slavery or anti-slavery remains a subject of debate.

Explore related products

Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

$17.1 $19.99

Class Conflict, Slavery, and the United States Constitution

$19.77 $28

A Slaveholders' Union: Slavery, Politics, and the Constitution in the Early American Republic

$32 $31.99

Frederick Douglass, Slavery, and the Constitution, 1845 (Reacting to the Past)

$41.78

Slavery’s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution

$36.02 $45

A Necessary Evil?: Slavery and the Debate of the Constitution

$91.7

The US Constitution did not contain the words slave or slavery

The original United States Constitution did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery" within its text. The framers of the Constitution believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. They were convinced that if the Constitution restricted the slave trade, states like South Carolina and Georgia would refuse to join the Union.

The framers' conflicted stance towards slavery led them to deliberately avoid using direct language about the institution in the Constitution. Many of them opposed slavery on moral grounds, but they prioritized political unity over abolition. This resulted in key compromises, such as the Three-Fifths Clause and the Fugitive Slave Clause, which protected slaveholding interests. The framers used euphemisms like "persons held to service or labor" instead of explicit references to slavery, reflecting their attempt to avoid a moral confrontation while preserving the institution.

The Constitution dealt directly with American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution elsewhere in the document. For example, the Fugitive Slave Clause provided that a slave escaping into another state would not become free but would be returned to their owner as established by the laws of their state of origin. The Three-Fifths Clause counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation, giving the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College.

The absence of the words "slave" and "slavery" in the original Constitution is one of the great paradoxes of the Founding Era. The framers were revolutionary thinkers who advocated for fairness, justice, and individual rights, yet they allowed human beings to be reduced to chattel. This contradiction between their ideals and the reality of slavery in America created a moral and legal crisis that would contribute to the Civil War.

The Constitution indirectly addressed slavery and the slave trade without using those terms

The original United States Constitution did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery" within its text. However, it did address American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution in other parts of the document. The framers of the Constitution believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. They were convinced that if the Constitution restricted the slave trade, states like South Carolina and Georgia would refuse to join the Union.

The Constitution included four clauses that indirectly addressed slavery and the slave trade without using those terms. For example, the Fugitive Slave Clause provided that a slave escaping into another state would not become free but would be returned to their owner as established by the laws of the slave's state of origin. The Three-Fifths Clause is another example of a clause that indirectly addressed slavery. It stated that when a state's population was counted for representation in government and direct taxation, the enslaved population would be counted as three-fifths of its total population. This gave the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College.

The framers' conflicted stance towards slavery led them to deliberately avoid using direct language about the institution in the Constitution. While many personally opposed slavery on moral grounds, they prioritized political unity over abolition. This resulted in key compromises, such as the Three-Fifths Clause and the Fugitive Slave Clause, that protected slaveholding interests. The framers used euphemisms like "persons held to service or labor" instead of explicit references to slavery, reflecting their attempt to avoid a moral confrontation while preserving the institution.

The absence of the term "slavery" in the Constitution is one of the great paradoxes of the Founding Era. The framers were revolutionary thinkers who advocated for fairness, justice, and individual rights, yet they allowed human beings to be reduced to chattel. This contradiction between their ideals and their actions on slavery created a moral and legal crisis that contributed to the Civil War.

The Founding Fathers criticized slavery but did not abolish it

The original United States Constitution, drafted in 1787 and ratified in 1789, did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery" within its text. However, it directly addressed American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution in other parts of the document. The Founding Fathers, who were revolutionary thinkers and champions of individual rights, severely criticized slavery. However, they did not abolish it, prioritizing political unity over abolition.

The framers of the Constitution, many of whom owned slaves, believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. They were convinced that if the Constitution restricted the slave trade, states like South Carolina and Georgia would refuse to join the Union. This belief was echoed by John Rutledge of South Carolina, who argued that unless the regulation of the slave trade was left to the states, the southernmost states "shall not be parties to the union."

The framers' conflicted stance towards slavery led them to deliberately avoid using direct language about the institution in the Constitution. They used euphemisms like "persons held to service or labor" instead of explicit references to slavery, reflecting their attempt to avoid a moral confrontation while preserving the institution. The economic and political realities of slavery also made substantive action impossible during the Constitutional Convention.

The Constitution included clauses that indirectly addressed slavery, such as the Fugitive Slave Clause, which required states to return fugitive slaves to their owners, and the Three-Fifths Clause, which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation, giving the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. These clauses were the result of compromises made to accommodate the interests of slaveholding states and maintain political unity.

The Founding Fathers' failure to abolish slavery, despite their criticism of it, laid the foundation for tragic events in the future, including the Civil War. It was not until the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, passed in 1865, that slavery was officially abolished in the United States.

Explore related products

Creating a More Perfect Slaveholders' Union: Slavery, the Constitution, and Secession in Antebellum America (Constitutional Thinking)

$10.76 $59.99

Born Equal: Remaking America’s Constitution, 1840–1920

$35.05 $40

Lincoln's Constitution

$8.25 $17

The U.S. Constitution and Secession: A Documentary Anthology of Slavery and White Supremacy

$29.99 $37.99

Lincoln and the Politics of Slavery: The Other Thirteenth Amendment and the Struggle to Save the Union (Civil War America)

$56.51 $27.95

A Glorious Liberty: Frederick Douglass and the Fight for an Antislavery Constitution

$19.95 $19.95

The Constitution's Fugitive Slave Clause and Three-Fifths Clause were pro-slavery

The original United States Constitution did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery" within its text. However, it dealt directly with American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution in other parts of the document. The Constitution's Fugitive Slave Clause and Three-Fifths Clause have been described as "the bricks and mortar of the pro-slavery Constitution".

The Fugitive Slave Clause, also known as the Slave Clause or the Fugitives From Labour Clause, is Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution. It requires a "Person held to Service or Labour" who flees to another state to be returned to their master in the state from which they escaped. The framers of the Constitution avoided using the word "slave" to prevent moral confrontation while preserving slavery. The Fugitive Slave Clause was a last-minute addition to the Constitution, with the phrase "legally held to service or labour in one state" changed to "held to service or labour in one state, under the laws thereof". This change made it impossible to interpret the Constitution as legally sanctioning slavery.

The Three-Fifths Clause, also known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation. This gave the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. The Compromise was proposed by delegate James Wilson and seconded by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina. It was accepted by the Convention, which unanimously agreed that representation in the House of Representatives would be in proportion to the relative state populations. The Compromise reduced the representation of slave states in the House of Representatives compared to if all slaves had been counted. However, it increased representation for the slave states compared to the position of the Northern states, which argued that only voters should be counted.

The Constitution's framers believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of Southern delegates. They were convinced that if the Constitution restricted the slave trade, Southern states such as South Carolina and Georgia would refuse to join the Union. Many of the framers personally opposed slavery but prioritised political unity over abolition. As a result, the Constitution included key compromises that protected the interests of slaveholders.

The 13th Amendment to the Constitution abolished slavery in 1865

The original United States Constitution did not contain the words "slave" or "slavery" within its text. However, it dealt directly with American slavery in at least five of its provisions and indirectly protected the institution in several other ways. For example, the Fugitive Slave Clause and the Three-Fifths Clause, which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation, protected the interests of slaveholders. The framers of the Constitution believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to maintain political unity and gain the support of southern delegates. Many framers had moral qualms about slavery, but they prioritized unity and a strong central government over abolition.

The 13th Amendment to the Constitution, passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, abolished slavery in the United States. It states: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." The 13th Amendment was one of three Reconstruction Amendments adopted following the American Civil War, along with the 14th and 15th Amendments, which greatly expanded the civil rights of Americans.

The 13th Amendment was preceded by President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, which declared that "all persons held as slaves within any State... shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free." However, the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery nationwide as it only applied to areas of the Confederacy in rebellion against the Union. Lincoln recognized that a constitutional amendment was necessary to guarantee the abolishment of slavery. The 13th Amendment fulfilled that goal, providing a final constitutional solution to the issue of slavery.

Frequently asked questions