How Supreme Court Decisions Can Be Overturned

The Supreme Court is the highest authority in matters of federal law, but its decisions can be overturned by Congress under certain conditions. If the Supreme Court interprets a federal statute, Congress can enact a new or revised statute to correct the Court's interpretation. However, if the Court is interpreting the Constitution, its opinion is generally final. In the United States, the only way to override the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution is for two-thirds of both houses of Congress to propose an amendment, which then must be ratified by three-quarters of the states. This process has been referred to as an unconstitutional constitutional amendment, but it has never been successfully executed in the United States. While the Supreme Court of Israel struck down an amendment to the Basic Law in 2024, no amendment to the US Constitution has ever been ruled unconstitutional by a US court.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$102.48 $150

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.18

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Constitution are final

The Supreme Court's role is to interpret the Constitution and decide what is constitutional and what is not. Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Constitution are generally final. For instance, the Supreme Court's decision that the Constitution does not include the right to abortion is final. While Congress cannot reverse the court's interpretation via statute, it could try to achieve the same goal through other means.

Congress can regulate commerce and attach conditions to money given to states. It can also enforce the Reconstruction Amendments that sought to establish greater equality after the Civil War. If the Supreme Court's ruling is interpreting a federal statute instead of the Constitution, Congress can enact a new or revised statute to correct the Supreme Court. For example, when the Supreme Court concluded that the Equal Protection Clause only prohibits discrimination by government entities and not private entities, Congress extended non-discrimination to the private sector through its power to regulate commerce.

When Congress disagrees with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution, the only direct way to override that interpretation is for two-thirds of both houses of Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution, which then must be ratified by three-quarters of the states. However, no amendment to the US Constitution has ever been ruled unconstitutional by a court. The US Constitution sets high standards for amendments but places few limits on the content of amendments.

In other countries, courts have the power to strike down amendments. For example, in 2015, the Supreme Court of Honduras declared unconstitutional a part of the original 1982 constitution that created a one-term limit for the president. In Israel, the Supreme Court ruled that it may reject amendments to Basic Laws in "extreme" circumstances.

Congress can overturn Supreme Court rulings interpreting federal statutes

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the country and has the final say in interpreting the Constitution and federal laws. This power allows the Supreme Court to check the other branches of government. While the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution is generally final, Congress can overturn Supreme Court rulings interpreting federal statutes. This is because Congress has the authority to create lower federal courts and determine their structure and jurisdiction.

Congress can respond to court decisions by passing new legislation or amending existing laws, as long as these changes are constitutional. Congress can also propose amendments to the Constitution to address judicial interpretations. This requires a rigorous approval process involving both houses of Congress and ratification by the states.

For example, when the Supreme Court concluded that the Equal Protection Clause prohibits only discrimination by government entities and not private entities, Congress extended non-discrimination to the private sector through its power to regulate commerce. Congress has also introduced legislation aimed at overturning a Supreme Court decision reducing the power of federal agencies to interpret congressional statutes. The Stop Corporate Capture Act seeks to reinstate the Chevron precedent and codify the previous standard under which federal agencies were entitled to some deference when interpreting and implementing ambiguous congressional statutes.

While Congress can overturn Supreme Court rulings interpreting federal statutes, it is important to note that there are limits to this power. Congress cannot directly overturn a federal court decision due to the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances established by the Constitution. Additionally, if the Supreme Court's ruling is interpreting the Constitution itself, Congress cannot reverse the court's interpretation via statute but may try to achieve the same goal through other means.

Supreme Court rulings can be indirectly countered through other means

While the Supreme Court's rulings on the interpretation of the Constitution are generally final, there are strategies Congress can use to indirectly counter these rulings. For instance, in the United States, when the Supreme Court concluded that the Equal Protection Clause only prohibits discrimination by government entities and not private entities, Congress used its power to regulate commerce to extend non-discrimination to the private sector.

In another instance, Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren introduced the Stop Corporate Capture Act, aimed at overturning a Supreme Court decision that reduced the power of federal agencies to interpret congressional statutes. The Act seeks to reinstate the Chevron precedent, which allowed federal agencies to interpret and implement ambiguous congressional statutes.

Additionally, Congress can indirectly counter Supreme Court rulings by enacting new or revised statutes that correct the Court's interpretation of federal statutes. This strategy is permissible as long as the Court's ruling is based on interpreting a federal statute rather than the Constitution itself.

In the case of a disagreement with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution, Congress can propose an amendment to the Constitution. However, this requires a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states, making it a challenging process.

While the Supreme Court's ability to block or overturn constitutional amendments is debated, it is generally accepted that the Court cannot block an amendment unless the correct procedure for ratification is not followed. The Court's primary role is to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of laws and actions.

In summary, while the Supreme Court's rulings on constitutional matters are typically final, Congress can employ various strategies, such as passing new statutes, utilising regulatory powers, and proposing constitutional amendments, to indirectly counter these rulings.

Explore related products

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.34 $45

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$16.71 $26.99

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy

$12.65 $27.95

The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution

$16.69 $17.95

The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment: Its Letter and Spirit

$21.34 $22.95

Supreme Courts cannot overturn constitutional amendments

The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution and decide what is constitutional and what is not. Supreme Courts cannot overturn constitutional amendments. The Constitution is the highest authority regarding the powers of the government. An amendment, by definition, cannot be unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution is generally final. However, if the Supreme Court's ruling is interpreting a federal statute as opposed to the Constitution itself, Congress can enact a new or revised statute to correct the Supreme Court. For example, when the Supreme Court concluded that the Equal Protection Clause prohibits only discrimination by government entities and not private entities, Congress extended non-discrimination to the private sector through its power to regulate commerce.

Congress can also address disagreements with Supreme Court interpretations of statutes by proposing an amendment to the Constitution, which then must be ratified by three-quarters of the states.

The Constitution gives federal courts jurisdiction over "cases" and "controversies". This has been interpreted to mean that courts can only hear legal disputes about things that are actually happening. "Advisory opinions" about possible future laws or events are strictly prohibited.

Unconstitutional constitutional amendments are possible

The concept of an "unconstitutional constitutional amendment" refers to the idea that a constitutional amendment can be deemed unconstitutional. This doctrine has been explored by legal scholars and adopted by various courts internationally. While it is possible for a Supreme Court to utilise this doctrine, it is generally rare for amendments to be made to a constitution, and even rarer for a court to overturn a constitutional amendment.

In the United States, the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution is typically final, but there are ways for Congress to check the court's power. If the Supreme Court is interpreting a federal statute, Congress can amend or enact a new statute to correct the court. This is what is currently being attempted with the Stop Corporate Capture Act, which aims to overturn a Supreme Court decision and reinstate a previous standard regarding federal agencies' interpretation of congressional statutes.

However, if the Supreme Court is interpreting the Constitution itself, Congress's ability to reverse the court's interpretation is more limited. In such cases, the only direct way to override the court's interpretation is for two-thirds of both houses of Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution, which then must be ratified by three-quarters of the states. This process is challenging and occurs infrequently.

The question of whether a constitutional amendment is unconstitutional is a complex one. Legal scholars have debated the criteria for determining unconstitutionality, with some arguing that it should be based on the democracy, inclusivity, and deliberative nature of both the constitution-making and amendment processes. Others have criticised the doctrine for violating canons of construction, such as the lex specialis canon, which prioritises specific over general language.

Frequently asked questions