Banks' Political Donations: Legal Or Ethical Grey Area?

Political campaigns can be expensive, and fundraising is an important part of the election process. In the US, laws regulating campaign donations, spending, and public funding are enforced by the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The FEC prohibits national banks and federally chartered corporations from making contributions or expenditures in connection with any election, be it federal, state, or local. However, bank employees may make contributions from their personal funds. Interestingly, a 2017 study found that relatively unpopular industries, which may include banking, tend to provide larger contributions to candidates.

Can banks donate to political campaigns?

Explore related products

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®

$12.77 $16.95

The Campaign Finance Cases: Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$20.67 $29.99

Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values)

$19.84 $32

The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook

$31.83

PACs, Activism, & Campaign Finance Law: How You Can Quickly & Easily Build Your Own Political Action Committee using PACs, Super PACs, and FARA (The ... and the Science of Electioneering)

$19 $7.95

Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform

$23.87 $51

National banks are prohibited from contributing to political campaigns

National banks are prohibited from contributing financially to political campaigns or candidates. This prohibition, which is enforced by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), applies to all federal, state, and local elections, political conventions, and caucuses. The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 USC § 441b, makes it unlawful for national banks to provide any contributions, services, or anything of value to any candidate, campaign committee, or political organization in connection with any election to political office.

This includes, but is not limited to, the purchase of tickets to political fundraising events, advertisements in political literature, and donations of goods or services for political fundraising activities. National banks are also prohibited from making indirect contributions, such as through separate segregated funds or Super PACs. The Tillman Act of 1907 was the first legislation to prohibit corporations and nationally chartered banks from making direct financial contributions to federal candidates.

While national banks cannot contribute directly to political campaigns, they can serve as depositories for political committees and pay interest and dividends on funds in such accounts. Bank employees are also permitted to make personal contributions from their own funds. Additionally, national banks are not prohibited from contributing to a fund to influence a ballot referendum, as long as it does not involve elections to political office.

Campaign finance laws and regulations are essential to ensure transparency and fairness in the political process. These laws help prevent the influence of special interests and ensure that all candidates have an equal opportunity to participate in the democratic process. It is important for banks and other organizations to comply with these regulations to maintain the integrity of elections.

Bank employees can make personal contributions

In the United States, laws regulating campaign donations, spending, and public funding are enforced by the Federal Election Commission (FEC). FEC regulations prohibit national banks from making political contributions or expenditures in connection with any election, be it federal, state, or local. This includes indirect contributions, such as purchasing tickets to political fundraising events, advertisements in political literature, and donations of goods or services for political events.

However, this does not extend to bank employees, who are permitted to make personal contributions from their own funds. This means that bank employees can contribute to political campaigns in their own capacity, separate from their employment at a bank.

It is important to note that these regulations only apply to national banks and federally chartered corporations. A political committee that has incorporated solely for liability purposes is not considered a prohibited source of funding. Additionally, a national bank can contribute to a fund aiming to influence a ballot referendum, as long as it does not involve elections to political office.

While bank employees are free to make personal contributions, they should be mindful of any internal policies or guidelines their bank may have regarding political donations. These policies may vary from bank to bank, and employees should ensure they are aware of any relevant rules to avoid potential issues.

Campaign finance laws vary by state

Campaign finance laws in the United States are enforced by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), an independent federal agency. These laws apply only to candidates and groups participating in federal elections, such as congressional and presidential elections.

For non-federal offices, campaign finance laws are enacted and enforced at the state and local levels, with each state having its own set of regulations. These laws vary across different states and govern how money is raised and spent during political campaigns.

While federal laws prohibit corporations, including national banks, from contributing to federal elections, they may contribute to state and local elections in some states. For example, a national bank can contribute to a ballot referendum that does not involve elections for political office.

State and local candidates must adhere to the specific campaign finance laws in their respective states, which may include regulations on contribution limits, disclosure requirements, and the types of organizations and individuals allowed to donate.

Some states may have stricter regulations than others, and it is essential for candidates and donors to be aware of the specific laws in their state to ensure compliance and transparency in the campaign financing process.

Explore related products

Campaign Finance & American Democracy: What the Public Really Thinks and Why It Matters

$2.99 $32

The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform

$29.17 $32

Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail

$29.95

Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities

$48

Evaluating Campaign Finance Oversight: An Assessment of the Federal Election Commission

$94.5 $105

American Government 101: From the Continental Congress to the Iowa Caucus, Everything You Need to Know About US Politics (Adams 101 Series)

$10.99 $16.99

Campaigns are prohibited from accepting certain contributions

• Corporations, including nonprofit corporations. However, funds from a corporate separate segregated fund are permissible.
• National banks and federally chartered corporations are prohibited from making contributions in connection with any election, be it federal, state, or local. This prohibition includes any incorporated organization, such as a nonstock corporation, trade association, or incorporated cooperative.
• Labor organizations. However, funds from a separate segregated fund are allowed.
• Federally chartered corporations.
• Charities, which face additional restrictions on political activity under the Internal Revenue Code.
• Federal government contractors.
• Foreign nationals in connection with any federal, state, or local election.

Furthermore, campaigns may not accept contributions that violate the prohibitions on contributions, such as an extension of credit to a political committee by an incorporated commercial vendor unless specific conditions are met. Contributions made by one person in the name of another are also prohibited.

The wealthy can spend unlimited amounts on campaigns

National banks and federally chartered corporations are prohibited from making direct contributions to political campaigns. This includes any incorporated organisation, such as a nonstock corporation, a trade association, an incorporated membership organisation, and an incorporated cooperative. However, this prohibition does not extend to political committees or PACs (political action committees) established by these entities, which can accept contributions from their treasury funds.

While direct contributions from banks and corporations are prohibited, the influence of wealth in political campaigns remains significant. Critics argue that Supreme Court decisions, particularly Citizens United v. FEC (2010), have allowed the wealthy to spend unlimited amounts on campaigns through Political Action Committees and Super PACs. This has resulted in a dominance of "big money" in US political campaigns, with a small number of wealthy donors accounting for a disproportionate amount of campaign financing.

The ability of the wealthy to spend unlimited amounts on campaigns has raised concerns about the influence of "dark money" in politics. Dark money refers to campaign donations where the source of funding is not disclosed, preventing voters from knowing who is trying to influence them. The increasing influence of dark money has been attributed to the failure of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce campaign finance laws effectively.

To address these concerns, organisations such as the Brennan Center for Justice have proposed reforms to increase transparency in election spending and curb the influence of Super PACs. These proposals include stricter rules for non-candidate political spending, disclosure requirements for all groups engaged in political spending, and closing loopholes that allow candidates to coordinate with Super PACs.

While the influence of wealth in political campaigns is a complex issue, there are ongoing efforts to address the concerns raised by critics and ensure a fair and transparent campaign finance system.

Frequently asked questions