The Constitution's Explicitly Granted Powers

are those powers that are explicitly granted by the constitution

The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution, ratified in 1791, explicitly outlines the powers granted to the federal government, with all other powers being delegated to the states. This amendment acts as a rule for interpreting the Constitution, establishing a dynamic where the federal government possesses significant authority, but only within the confines of the powers explicitly listed in the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment reinforces the idea of federalism, a concept that is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but is considered one of its most important and innovative aspects. The amendment has been invoked in several Supreme Court decisions to determine whether the federal government has overstepped its authority. The interpretation and application of the Tenth Amendment have evolved over time, playing a pivotal role in shaping the relationship between federal and state governments in the US.

Characteristics Values
Powers explicitly granted to the federal government Regulation of intrastate commerce, regulation of commercial activities within states, regulation of activities affecting interstate commerce, power to regulate homegrown marijuana
Powers explicitly granted to the states All powers not specifically delegated to the federal government, including the power to regulate internal state commerce, the power to grant women the right to vote, the power to enforce Black Codes
Powers explicitly granted to both the federal government and the states The power to enact civil rights protections

cycivic

The Tenth Amendment

The text of the Tenth Amendment is as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This amendment clarifies the power dynamic between the federal and state governments, specifying that any power not explicitly granted to the federal government is delegated to the states or the people.

cycivic

Federalism

The Tenth Amendment, ratified in 1791, reinforces this idea by stating that any powers not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved for the states or the people. This amendment was added to the Constitution to address concerns about the federal government overreaching and infringing on the liberties of the people. It is interpreted as a way to limit the federal government to only the powers explicitly listed in the Constitution, with all other powers being left to the states.

The Ninth Amendment also plays a role in federalism by stating that the list of rights in the Bill of Rights is not exhaustive, implying that people have other fundamental rights beyond those listed. The Tenth Amendment complements this by suggesting that the powers granted to the federal government in the Constitution are exhaustive.

The Supreme Court has invoked the Tenth Amendment on several occasions to determine whether the federal government has overstepped its authority. For example, in United States v. Alfonso D. Lopez, Jr. (1995), the Court ruled that federal laws establishing "gun-free zones" on school campuses were unconstitutional because there was no specific authorisation in the Constitution. Similarly, in United States v. Darby (1941), the Court affirmed that the Tenth Amendment reinforces the idea that all powers not surrendered to the federal government are retained by the states.

However, federalism has evolved over time, especially after the Civil War, when the Thirteenth Amendment was enacted to abolish slavery and prevent states from enforcing it within their borders. Despite this, some states found ways to oppress freed slaves, leading to a shift in the balance between federal and state powers.

cycivic

State Powers

The Tenth Amendment, ratified in 1791, is a key component of the US Constitution that explicitly defines and delineates the powers of the states. It states that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people".

This amendment is significant as it reinforces the concept of federalism, a fundamental principle of the US political system, by establishing a clear power dynamic between the federal government and the states. The Tenth Amendment specifies that any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government are reserved for the states or the people. This ensures that the federal government's authority is limited to only those powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution, while the states retain a broad range of powers.

The interpretation and application of the Tenth Amendment have been contentious issues throughout US history, often debated in the context of civil rights and state sovereignty. For example, in the 1824 case of Gibbons v. Ogden, Chief Justice John Marshall referred to the reserved state powers as "that immense mass of legislation which embraces everything within the territory of a State not surrendered to the General Government". On the other hand, the Supreme Court's ruling in Gonzales v. Reich (2005) upheld the power of the federal government to regulate homegrown marijuana, despite state laws legalising it, based on the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the Constitution.

The Ninth and Tenth Amendments are unique in that they do not explicitly grant constitutional rights but instead serve as rules for interpreting the Constitution. They emphasise that the federal government's powers are limited to those specifically enumerated, while the states retain the authority to address issues not delegated to the federal government, such as intrastate commerce and social issues. This dynamic allows states to act as "laboratories of democracy", as described by Justice Louis Brandeis, where they can craft unique solutions to local problems.

cycivic

Congress's Powers

The US Constitution, which was ratified in 1787, outlines the powers of Congress in Article I, Section 8. The Constitution established a federal government with defined powers, and any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government are reserved for the states.

The Tenth Amendment, ratified in 1791, reinforces the idea that powers not specifically delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states. It states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The Tenth Amendment was created to address concerns about the federal government overreaching and infringing on people's liberties.

  • Regulate commerce, including interstate commerce and commerce with foreign nations
  • Establish uniform laws regarding bankruptcy
  • Coin money and regulate its value
  • Establish post offices and post roads
  • Promote scientific progress by securing intellectual property rights for a limited time
  • Establish lower federal courts
  • Declare war
  • Raise and support armies and navies
  • Make rules for the military
  • Call forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions
  • Provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia
  • Exercise exclusive legislation over the District of Columbia

Additionally, Congress has the power to pass laws that are "necessary and proper" for carrying out its enumerated powers, as stated in the Constitution's Elastic Clause. This clause grants Congress the flexibility to adapt to new situations and address issues that may not have existed when the Constitution was written.

cycivic

Supreme Court Decisions

The Tenth Amendment, ratified in 1791, is a key factor in determining the powers explicitly granted by the US Constitution. It states that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people". This amendment has been interpreted as a limitation on the federal government, specifying that any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government are reserved for the states.

The Tenth Amendment has been invoked in several Supreme Court decisions to determine whether the federal government has overstepped its authority. For example, in United States v. Darby (1941), the Supreme Court ruled that the Tenth Amendment did not deprive the federal government of the authority to regulate activities that affect interstate commerce, as long as it was appropriate and adapted to a permitted end. This established a broad understanding of federal authority over commercial activities within states.

In another case, Gonzales v. Reich (2005), the Supreme Court upheld the power of the federal government to regulate homegrown marijuana, despite state laws allowing its legalization. The Court cited the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the Constitution, which makes federal law superior to state law.

The Tenth Amendment has also been used to expand and contract the authority of the federal government in other areas, such as in United States v. Alfonso D. Lopez, Jr. (1995), which limited the federal government's authority to enact policies through the Commerce Clause. Additionally, the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments further constrained state power and granted Congress the power to enforce those constraints, respectively.

The interpretation of the Tenth Amendment and the balance of power between the federal government and the states continue to be a subject of debate and Supreme Court decisions.

Frequently asked questions

The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, specifies that any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government are reserved for the states or the people.

The Tenth Amendment reinforces the idea that the federal government's authority is limited to the powers specifically listed in the Constitution. Any powers not explicitly mentioned are left to the states to regulate.

While the Tenth Amendment serves as a guideline for interpreting the Constitution, it is not absolute. For example, in Gonzales v. Reich (2005), the Supreme Court upheld the power of the federal government to regulate homegrown marijuana, despite states' laws legalizing it, citing the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the Constitution, which makes federal law superior to state law.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment