Students' Rights: What Does The Constitution Protect?

are students protected by the constitution

Students in the United States are not protected by the Constitution in the same way that adult citizens are. While the 14th Amendment has helped to ensure students have access to equitable educational opportunities, the Supreme Court has ruled that students don't get the same level of protection as adults when it comes to searches and seizures. Students also have fewer free speech rights than adults, with administrators having the power to censor student newspaper articles and restrict certain types of speech.

Characteristics Values
Protection from search and seizure Students do not have the same level of protection as adults
First Amendment rights Public school students enjoy First Amendment protection depending on the type of expression and their age
Corporal punishment The U.S. military outlawed corporal punishment in 1862, but it's still permissible to hit students in more than a dozen states
Procedural protections Students do not get the same procedural protections as adult citizens
Due process Students only receive minimal due-process rights
Right to public education The U.S. Constitution doesn't explicitly guarantee a right to public education
Political speech Students can engage in political speech at school, but there are some constraints

cycivic

Students' First Amendment rights

Students are protected by the Constitution, but they do not get the same level of protection as adults. For example, the Supreme Court has ruled that students can be searched without a warrant or probable cause. Students also do not have the same procedural protections as adult citizens and only receive minimal due-process rights.

Public school students enjoy First Amendment protection depending on the type of expression and their age. The Supreme Court clarified in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) that public students do not “shed” their First Amendment rights “at the schoolhouse gate”. This means that students can engage in political speech at school, such as wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. However, administrators can censor student newspaper articles and restrict speech that is considered vulgar, lewd, promotes drug use, causes a substantial disruption to school, or infringes on another student’s rights.

The Constitution does not explicitly guarantee a right to public education, but the 14th Amendment has helped to ensure that students have access to equitable educational opportunities.

cycivic

Students' rights to protection from searches

Students do not have the same level of protection as adults under the US Constitution. For example, the Supreme Court has ruled that students are not protected from searches in the same way as adults. The government and the police generally can't search homes or belongings without a warrant or "probable cause" that someone committed a crime. However, students do not get the same level of protection.

Students in public schools do have First Amendment protection, depending on the type of expression and their age. The Supreme Court clarified in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) that public students do not "shed" their First Amendment rights "at the schoolhouse gate". This means that students can engage in political speech at school, such as wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. However, administrators have some leeway to censor student newspaper articles and students can be restricted on speech that is considered vulgar or lewd, promotes drug use, causes a "material and substantial disruption" to school, or infringes on another student's rights.

The US Constitution does not explicitly guarantee a right to public education. However, the 14th Amendment has helped to ensure that students have access to equitable educational opportunities.

Students also do not receive the same procedural protections as adult citizens. They typically only receive minimal due-process rights. They need only be told what they did wrong and given a chance to respond; they do not need to be given anything in writing before being punished.

cycivic

Students' rights to protection from corporal punishment

Students in the US are not explicitly protected by the Constitution, but the 14th Amendment has helped to ensure students have access to equitable educational opportunities. The Supreme Court has also ruled that students do not get the same level of protection as adult citizens. For example, students are not protected from searches of their homes or belongings by the government or police, and they only receive minimal due-process rights.

However, public school students do enjoy First Amendment protection depending on the type of expression and their age. The Supreme Court clarified in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) that public students do not “shed” their First Amendment rights “at the schoolhouse gate”.

Students are also not protected from corporal punishment, which is defined as "any punishment in which physical force is used and intended to cause some degree of pain or discomfort". Corporal punishment is not only physically hurtful, but it can also cause emotional damage, humiliation, and shame. It often leads to academic disengagement, higher dropout rates, and impairs academic progress. Students with disabilities are also routinely subjected to other forms of physical discipline in addition to paddling, which impedes their rights to education. Human rights law protects students with disabilities from violence and cruel and inhuman treatment, and guarantees them non-discriminatory access to an inclusive education.

cycivic

Students' rights to due process

Students do not have the same rights as adult citizens. They are only entitled to minimal due-process rights. Students need only be told what they did wrong and given a chance to respond; they do not need to be given anything in writing before being punished.

The Supreme Court has ruled that students don't get the same level of protection as adult citizens. For example, students can be hit in more than a dozen states, and the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld paddling as a form of punishment.

Public school students do enjoy First Amendment protection, depending on the type of expression and their age. The Supreme Court clarified in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) that public students do not "shed" their First Amendment rights "at the schoolhouse gate". However, administrators have some leeway to censor student newspaper articles, and students can be restricted on speech that's considered vulgar or lewd, promotes drug use, causes a "material and substantial disruption" to school, or infringes on another student's rights.

The 14th Amendment has helped to ensure students have access to equitable educational opportunities.

cycivic

Students' rights to equitable educational opportunities

Students do not have the same constitutional rights as adults. For example, the Supreme Court has ruled that students are not protected from searches of their homes or belongings in the same way that adults are. Students also do not have the same procedural protections as adults, and are only entitled to minimal due-process rights.

However, students do have some constitutional rights. The Supreme Court has recognised that students have First Amendment rights, including the right to engage in political speech at school. This was established in the 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines ruling, in which the Supreme Court said that students could wear black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War.

The 14th Amendment has also been interpreted as helping to ensure that students have access to equitable educational opportunities.

Frequently asked questions

Students are protected by the constitution, but not to the same extent as adults. The Supreme Court has ruled that students don't get the same level of protection as adults when it comes to things like searches and seizures.

Public school students enjoy First Amendment protection depending on the type of expression and their age. The Supreme Court clarified in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) that public students do not "shed" their First Amendment rights "at the schoolhouse gate". However, administrators have some leeway to censor student speech if it is considered vulgar or lewd, promotes drug use, causes a substantial disruption to school, or infringes on another student's rights.

The U.S. Constitution doesn't explicitly guarantee a right to public education. However, the 14th Amendment has been interpreted to ensure that students have access to equitable educational opportunities.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment