
Political text messages are a common occurrence during election season, but are they legal? In the United States, the primary piece of legislation governing text messaging is the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991, which requires senders to obtain prior express consent from the recipient before sending automated text messages. This has created a complex regulatory environment, with state-specific regulations that political campaigns must navigate to ensure compliance. While mass text messaging regulations are clear about consent, the debate over whether the TCPA covers P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging is ongoing. With the high open rates for text messages, political campaigns must strike a balance between leveraging this effective communication channel and respecting voter preferences and privacy.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Political text messages sent to mobile phones using an autodialer | Require the called party's prior express consent |
| Political text messages sent manually | Can be sent without prior consent |
| Reporting unsolicited political text messages | Forward the text to 7726 or "SPAM" |
| Opting out of future political text messages | Reply with the message "STOP" |
| Political text messages that do not comply with FCC rules | File an informal complaint with the FCC at fcc.gov/complaints |
| Political text messages that are false or hurtful | May be against the law |
| Political text messages that are spam | May be illegal |
| Political text messages in California | Must include an opt-out mechanism |
| Political text messages in New York | Require explicit written consent |
| Political text messages in Florida | Require clear identification of the sender and an opt-out mechanism |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Political text messages and consent
Political text messages are a common occurrence, especially during election seasons. While they are a convenient way to stay updated on candidates and causes, they can also be a nuisance, and even illegal in certain cases.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is the primary piece of legislation governing text messaging in the United States. Under the TCPA, text messages are considered calls, and political campaigns must adhere to specific rules when sending texts to voters. The two main provisions of the TCPA that apply to political text messaging are:
Consent Requirement
Political campaigns must obtain prior express consent from the recipient before sending automated text messages. This means that voters must have given clear permission to receive such messages. This can be done through various methods such as online forms, checking a box, or at campaign events. The burden of proof lies with the campaign, which must be able to produce records of consent if challenged.
Autodialer Restrictions
The use of an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) or autodialer to send text messages without prior consent is prohibited. Political text messages sent to a mobile phone using an autodialer require prior express consent, while messages sent manually can be sent without it.
Additionally, political text messages must include an opt-out mechanism, allowing recipients to stop receiving future messages. This can be done by replying "STOP" to the message.
It is important to note that there are ongoing debates and evolving changes to the regulatory landscape of political text messaging. For example, the distinction between peer-to-peer (P2P) messaging and A2P messaging, where P2P messaging is a more personal, one-to-one form of communication, is currently not covered by the TCPA.
Furthermore, the law has gray areas when it comes to political text messages, and litigation in this area can be challenging due to the short political cycles and the involvement of third-party political action committees (PACs).
To summarize, political text messages require prior consent from the recipient, and the use of autodialers without consent is prohibited. Campaigns must maintain detailed records of consent and communications to ensure compliance and avoid legal issues.
Volunteering for Harris: A Guide to Getting Involved
You may want to see also

TCPA and political text messages
Political campaigns are increasingly turning to text messaging as a favorite mode of communication, surpassing traditional methods like email, phone calls, or flyers. While campaign calls and texts are exempt from the National Do Not Call Registry requirements, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) contains specific rules they must follow.
The TCPA was initially passed to regulate telemarketing calls, and those regulations now extend to text message marketing. Political messages are not exempt from the TCPA. When using a mass text message marketing platform, the sender must have the recipient's consent. To do so, they may check a box that gives the party or candidate permission to send such updates via text message. If the consumer challenges this, the candidate or party needs to show the consumer’s permission record.
However, a second category of texts, called peer-to-peer (P2P) messaging, is generally more reflective of a conversation between two people. They’re not automated mass texts and are supposed to feel like an individual is behind the message. The TCPA applies to text messages sent using an autodialer, which is a mass texting service that can message thousands of people in one click. With P2P messaging, the sender may use an app or generator, but since a single person is sending the message, this type of message doesn’t currently fall under the TCPA guidelines.
Whether or not the TCPA steps in to regulate P2P messaging depends on the level of consumer feedback. It’s more likely the TCPA will extend coverage over P2P messaging if consumers provide negative feedback about this type of political messaging. As technology advances, the laws will need to be reconsidered. Currently, there’s a strong legal argument positing that P2P is outside of the TCPA statutes.
If you are receiving texts that you didn't ask for, you can report the sender by forwarding the texts to 7726 (or "SPAM"). Campaigns should also honor opt-out requests if you reply "STOP." If you think you've received a political robocall or text that does not comply with the FCC's rules, you can file an informal complaint with the FCC at fcc.gov/complaints.
Trump's Four-Letter Insult: Decoding Harris Slur
You may want to see also

State-specific regulations
The legality of political text messaging in the United States is governed by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991. The TCPA was enacted to restrict telemarketing calls and the use of automated telephone equipment, and to establish the National Do Not Call Registry. Text messages are considered calls under the TCPA, and political campaigns must adhere to specific rules, including obtaining prior express consent from the recipient for automated texts and not using autodialers without prior consent.
- California: California law requires that political text messages include an opt-out mechanism, allowing recipients to easily stop receiving future messages.
- New York: New York has strict consent requirements, demanding explicit written consent from recipients before sending political texts.
- Florida: Florida's regulations align closely with federal TCPA standards, requiring clear identification of the sender and an opt-out mechanism.
- Arizona: Arizona has passed House Bill 2312, banning spam text messages and unsolicited ads via text.
- Indiana: Telemarketers cannot send unsolicited text messages to Indiana residents listed on the state's Do Not Call registry.
- New Jersey: New Jersey's text message privacy law, A-617, requires companies to receive permission before sending texts, with possible charges or text allocation impacts. SMS marketers must convey the number of messages sent and allow opt-outs.
- Oklahoma: The Oklahoma Telephone Solicitation Act prohibits SMS telemarketers from messaging an Oklahoma resident more than three times about the same subject within 24 hours. It also forbids texting before 8 a.m. and after 8 p.m. and sending messages using automated systems without prior consent.
- Connecticut: Connecticut law prohibits sending unsolicited text and media messages to state residents, regardless of whether they are auto-dialed or not.
Political Parties: Supporting Candidates to Victory
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Reporting unsolicited political text messages
Unsolicited political text messages are a common occurrence during election season. While they are not illegal, they do have to follow certain rules as outlined by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Political text messages sent to a mobile phone using an autodialer require the recipient's prior express consent. Messages sent manually can be sent without prior consent.
If you are receiving political text messages that you didn't ask for, you can take several steps to stop them and report the sender:
- Reply "STOP" to the message: Campaigns should honor opt-out requests, and this will remove you from their list.
- Report as spam: You can forward the text message to 7726, or "SPAM" on your phone. This helps your wireless provider identify and block similar messages in the future.
- Report on the messaging app: Look for the option to report junk or spam in the messaging app you are using.
- File a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC): If you believe you have received a political text that does not comply with the FCC's rules, you can file an informal complaint online at fcc.gov/complaints. You can also send a complaint by mail to the following address:
Federal Communications Commission Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau 45 L Street NE Washington, DC 20554
Please note that the above steps may not work for scam or fraudulent text messages, which can be more challenging to stop. Additionally, if you want to reduce the number of unknown senders, you can change your phone settings to filter out all unknown numbers. However, this may cause you to miss important text messages, such as appointment reminders.
Get Started in Politics: A Beginner's Guide
You may want to see also

Defamation and political text messages
Political text messages are a common occurrence during election seasons, and while they may be annoying or unwanted, they are not always illegal. However, when it comes to defamation and political text messages, the situation becomes more complex. Defamation is against the law, but political text messages that are false and hurtful may not always meet the legal threshold for defamation.
In the United States, the First Amendment highly protects political speech, as it is considered a matter of public concern. Campaign speech, in particular, is given significant leeway due to its role in a democratic society. As a result, there is a higher bar for defamation claims in the political context, and public figures, including politicians, are held to a lower standard.
To prove defamation, an individual must typically demonstrate that a false and defamatory statement was made about them, that the speaker knew of its false and defamatory nature, and that the speaker acted with reckless disregard for the truth or negligently failed to verify the facts. In Arizona, for example, a defamation claim must also show that the allegedly defamatory statement implied assertions of material fact that are provably false, rather than simply being an opinion.
The challenge with defamation cases arising from political text messages is that they can be difficult to prove. It is not enough to show that a political text message is false or misleading; the violation must be willful and knowing. Additionally, the recipient of the message must demonstrate that they have suffered material damage as a result of the defamatory statement.
Furthermore, the rapid evolution of technology has introduced new complexities, such as the distinction between peer-to-peer (P2P) messaging and automated mass text messaging services. While the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) regulates mass text message marketing, the applicability of the TCPA to P2P messaging is currently being debated in the courts. This distinction is important because it determines whether prior express consent is required for sending political text messages to individuals.
In conclusion, while defamation laws apply to political text messages, the high bar for proving defamation and the protections afforded to political speech make it challenging to hold senders of defamatory messages accountable. However, individuals who receive unsolicited political text messages can take steps to opt out and report spam, and in some cases, may have legal recourse through specialized lawyers.
Political Campaigns: Complete Control Over Information Sources
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Political text messages are not illegal, but they are regulated by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Political campaigns must obtain prior express consent from the recipient before sending automated text messages.
If you receive unsolicited political text messages, you can report the sender by forwarding the text to 7726 or "SPAM". You can also file an informal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
There are several challenges to litigating unsolicited political text messages. Firstly, the government may be hesitant to restrict political activities. Secondly, political cycles are short, and you may only receive these messages for a few weeks before an election. Finally, determining the sender of the messages can be difficult, as they may be sent by a third-party political action committee (PAC), which often shuts down after an election.
Political campaigns should obtain explicit consent from recipients before sending text messages. This can be done through online forms, campaign events, or other methods where voters can clearly opt-in. Campaigns should also maintain detailed records of consent and communications to ensure compliance and facilitate responses to legal scrutiny or complaints.

























