Amending The Constitution: A Tough Nut To Crack

The United States Constitution was designed to be a durable document, and amending it is a challenging and time-consuming process. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted as the Bill of Rights four years later. Amendments can be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. However, the latter method has never been used. Once proposed, an amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the states to become part of the Constitution. This means that a small minority of the country can prevent an amendment from being added. The amendment process ensures that only significant changes affecting all Americans or securing citizens' rights are made to the Constitution.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$103.16 $150

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.18

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.34 $45

The difficult process of amending the US Constitution

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come", as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s. The framers of the Constitution made it difficult to amend the document to ensure its longevity. Since its drafting in 1787, there have only been 27 amendments, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted as the Bill of Rights four years later.

Amending the US Constitution is a challenging and time-consuming process. A proposed amendment must be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress and then ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50). This means that a small minority of the country has the power to prevent an amendment from being added to the Constitution. For instance, if slightly more than one-third of the House of Representatives or the Senate objects to a proposal, it will not be adopted.

There are two methods for proposing amendments outlined in Article V of the Constitution. The first method, which has been used for all amendments so far, involves Congress proposing an amendment, which is then sent to the states for ratification. The second method, which has never been used, allows two-thirds of the state legislatures to call for a Constitutional Convention to propose amendments. These proposed amendments would then be sent to the states for ratification.

The process of amending the US Constitution is so difficult that even popular proposals, such as those for congressional term limits and a balanced budget amendment, have failed to be adopted. This shows that any idea for an amendment must be of significant impact, affecting all Americans or securing the rights of citizens.

Article V of the Constitution

Amending the US Constitution is not an easy task. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s that the Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come". To ensure its longevity, the framers made it difficult to amend. Since it was drafted in 1787, there have only been 27 amendments to the Constitution, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted in 1791 as the Bill of Rights.

Article V of the US Constitution outlines the procedures for amending the document. It establishes two methods for proposing amendments:

• The first method requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This is the only method that has been used so far.
• The second method involves a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. This method has never been used.

Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified. Article V provides two methods for ratification:

• Ratification by state legislatures: The amendment must be ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states).
• Ratification by conventions: The amendment must be ratified by conventions in three-fourths of the states.

Congress determines which method of ratification the states must follow. The Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for administering the ratification process. Once an amendment is ratified, it becomes part of the Constitution.

Two methods of proposing amendments

The process of amending the Constitution of the United States is not an easy task. The Founding Fathers included Article V of the Constitution to allow for changes in the Constitution, realizing that as time goes forward, there will be new ideas and there ought to be a mechanism for amendment. However, it was also understood that it shouldn't be easy to amend the Constitution.

Article V establishes two methods for proposing amendments to the Constitution. The first method requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, also known as a joint resolution. This method has been used thirty-three times to propose amendments, out of which twenty-seven have been ratified. The second method, which has never been used, involves a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.

Once an amendment is proposed by either of the two methods, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) to become a part of the Constitution. The ratification process is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist has delegated many of the duties associated with this function to the Director of the Federal Register.

The process of amending the Constitution is indeed challenging, as evidenced by the limited number of successful amendments. The difficulty in proposing and ratifying amendments ensures that the Constitution remains stable and enduring, as originally intended by the framers.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$16.7 $26.99

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy

$12.65 $27.95

The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution

$16.69 $17.95

The Founders' Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms

$21.74 $28.95

The role of the Archivist and the Director of the Federal Register

Amending the United States Constitution is not an easy task. The framers of the Constitution made it a difficult process to ensure its longevity. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted four years later as the Bill of Rights.

The Archivist

The Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for administering the ratification process after Congress proposes an amendment. The Archivist has delegated many of the ministerial duties associated with this function to the Director of the Federal Register. The Archivist manages the constitutional amending process, which includes submitting amendments proposed by Congress to the states for ratification, collecting state ratifications, and certifying amendments as part of the Constitution once three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) ratify them. When an amendment is ratified by the required number of states, the Archivist certifies that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and serves as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process has been completed. The Archivist's certification is final and conclusive.

The Director of the Federal Register

The Director of the Federal Register assists the Archivist in the amendment process. They follow procedures established by the Secretary of State and the Administrator of General Services, who previously performed these duties until NARA assumed responsibility in 1985. When a state ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends the Archivist an original or certified copy of the state action, which is immediately conveyed to the Director of the Federal Register. The Director examines the ratification documents for legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. If the documents are in order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them until an amendment is adopted or fails. The Director also drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid.

The need for amendments vs. the Constitution's endurance

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come", as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s. To ensure its longevity, the framers made it a challenging task to amend the document. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted four years later as the Bill of Rights. Amending the Constitution is a lengthy and arduous process, and rightly so, as it is a foundational document that should not be subject to the whims of fleeting political trends or the interests of a minority.

However, the enduring nature of the Constitution should not preclude necessary amendments that reflect the changing needs and values of American society. The Constitution must be a living document that can adapt to the times, ensuring it remains a relevant and effective framework for governing the nation. While the bar for amendments is intentionally set high, it should not be impenetrable, and the process should not be so onerous that it hinders progress and necessary change.

There have been numerous attempts to amend the Constitution, with at least 11,000 proposals introduced in Congress, demonstrating the desire for change and evolution in certain areas. However, the stringent requirements for ratification have resulted in many failed attempts. For instance, supporters of congressional term limits and a balanced budget amendment were unsuccessful in their efforts to secure new amendments. This difficulty in amending the Constitution has led to criticism, with some arguing that it is too challenging to adapt the document to modern needs.

On the other hand, the resilience of the Constitution is a testament to its endurance and the foresight of its framers. The Constitution has stood the test of time, providing a stable framework for the nation's governance. The amendment process, though challenging, is not impossible, and there are mechanisms in place for necessary changes to be made. The Constitution's endurance is a strength, ensuring stability and continuity, while the possibility of amendments allows for necessary adaptations.

Frequently asked questions